ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011
Study of large and highly stratified population datasets by combining iterative pruning principal component analysis and structure.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing: Methods, Tools, and Applications in Population Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic Ancestry Inference and Its Application for the Genetic Mapping of Human Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Assessing the power of principal components and wright's fixation index analyzes applied to reveal the genome-wide genetic differences between herds of Holstein cows.BMC genetics · 2020Article
- Ancestry-informative marker (AIM) SNP panel for the Malay population.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
- A different view on fine-scale population structure in Western African populations.Human genetics · 2020Article
- KinVis: a visualization tool to detect cryptic relatedness in genetic datasets.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- IPCAPS: an R package for iterative pruning to capture population structure.Source code for biology and medicine · 2019Article
- Nonparametric approaches for population structure analysis.Human genomics · 2018Review
- ThePeerJ · 2017Article
- Effects of Multiple Genetic Loci on Age at Onset in Frontotemporal Dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017Article
- Article
- Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.Ecology and evolution · 2014Review
- A phylogeny-based sampling strategy and power calculator informs genome-wide associations study design for microbial pathogens.Genome medicine · 2014Article
- Softwares and methods for estimating genetic ancestry in human populations.Human genomics · 2013Review
- Insight into the peopling of Mainland Southeast Asia from Thai population genetic structure.PloS one · 2013Article
- Advances in translational bioinformatics and population genomics in the Asia-Pacific.BMC genomics · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ever increasing sizes of population genetic datasets pose great challenges for population structure analysis. The Tracy-Widom (TW) statistical test is widely used for detecting structure. However, it has not been adequately investigated whether the TW statistic is susceptible to type I error, especially in large, complex datasets. Non-parametric, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) based methods for resolving structure have been developed which rely on the TW test. Although PCA-based methods can resolve structure, they cannot infer ancestry. Model-based methods are still needed for ancestry analysis, but they are not suitable for large datasets. We propose a new structure analysis framework for large datasets. This includes a new heuristic for detecting structure and incorporation of the structure patterns inferred by a PCA method to complement STRUCTURE analysis.
resultsA new heuristic called EigenDev for detecting population structure is presented. When tested on simulated data, this heuristic is robust to sample size. In contrast, the TW statistic was found to be susceptible to type I error, especially for large population samples. EigenDev is thus better-suited for analysis of large datasets containing many individuals, in which spurious patterns are likely to exist and could be incorrectly interpreted as population stratification. EigenDev was applied to the iterative pruning PCA (ipPCA) method, which resolves the underlying subpopulations. This subpopulation information was used to supervise STRUCTURE analysis to infer patterns of ancestry at an unprecedented level of resolution. To validate the new approach, a bovine and a large human genetic dataset (3945 individuals) were analyzed. We found new ancestry patterns consistent with the subpopulations resolved by ipPCA.
conclusionsThe EigenDev heuristic is robust to sampling and is thus superior for detecting structure in large datasets. The application of EigenDev to the ipPCA algorithm improves the estimation of the number of subpopulations and the individual assignment accuracy, especially for very large and complex datasets. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that the structure resolved by this approach complements parametric analysis, allowing a much more comprehensive account of population structure. The new version of the ipPCA software with EigenDev incorporated can be downloaded from http://www4a.biotec.or.th/GI/tools/ippca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.