Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21699434›Full record

ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2011

Polymeric nanofibers in tissue engineering.

Rebecca L Dahlin, F Kurtis Kasper, Antonios G Mikos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Simvastatin-loaded 3D aerogel scaffolds promote bone regeneration.Bio-medical materials and engineering · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebecca L DahlinDepartment of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77251-1892, USA.
F Kurtis Kasper
Antonios G Mikos

Funding

Flow Perfusion Bioreactor Fabrication of Bioactive Polymer/ECM Hybrid ConstructsR01AR057083 · NIAMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI MIKOS, ANTONIOS G. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR57083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymeric nanofibers can be produced using methods such as electrospinning, phase separation, and self-assembly, and the fiber composition, diameter, alignment, degradation, and mechanical properties can be tailored to the intended application. Nanofibers possess unique advantages for tissue engineering. The small diameter closely matches that of extracellular matrix fibers, and the relatively large surface area is beneficial for cell attachment and bioactive factor loading. This review will update the reader on the aspects of nanofiber fabrication and characterization important to tissue engineering, including control of porous structure, cell infiltration, and fiber degradation. Bioactive factor loading will be discussed with specific relevance to tissue engineering. Finally, applications of polymeric nanofibers in the fields of bone, cartilage, ligament and tendon, cardiovascular, and neural tissue engineering will be reviewed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNanofibersPolymersTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID21699434
PMCPMC3179616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.