ReviewTissue engineering. Part B, Reviews2011
Biomaterial selection for tooth regeneration.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem cell-driven biomedical technologies for tooth regeneration: engineering scaffolds, organoid models, and molecular targeted strategies.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Stromal-Derived Factor-1 (SDF-1/CXCL12) and Skin Wound Healing Research at the Intersection Between Regenerative Biology and Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Regenerative Strategies in Dentistry: Harnessing Stem Cells, Biomaterials and Bioactive Materials for Tissue Repair.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Cancer Modeling and Biomedicine: From Print Categories to Biological Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Therapeutic impacts of GNE‑477‑loaded HInternational journal of molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Improving Antimicrobial Properties of GelMA Biocomposite Hydrogels for Regenerative Endodontic Treatment.Polymers · 2024Article
- Amnion-derived hydrogels as a versatile platform for regenerative therapy: from lab to market.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Scaffolds for Dentin-Pulp Complex Regeneration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Research progress of biomimetic materials in oral medicine.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- Biomimetic Approaches in Clinical Endodontics.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cells and material-based strategies for regenerative endodontics.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Leveraging Advancements in Tissue Engineering for Bioprinting Dental Tissues.Bioprinting (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Which experimental models and explorations to use in regenerative endodontics? A comprehensive review on standard practices.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
- Chlorite oxidized oxyamylose differentially influences the microstructure of fibrin and self assembling peptide hydrogels as well as dental pulp stem cell behavior.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Local Drug Delivery Systems for Vital Pulp Therapy: A New Hope.International journal of biomaterials · 2021Review
- Evaluation of Silk Fibroin-RGD-Stem Cell Factor Scaffold Effect on Adhesion, Migration, and Proliferation of Stem Cells of Apical Papilla.Stem cells international · 2021Article
- Role and application of stem cells in dental regeneration: A comprehensive overview.EXCLI journal · 2021Review
- MTA Enhances the Potential of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Dentin-Pulp Complex Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Hydrogels and Dentin-Pulp Complex Regeneration: From the Benchtop to Clinical Translation.Polymers · 2020Review
- Review of Plastic Surgery Biomaterials and Current Progress in Their 3D Manufacturing Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomaterials are native or synthetic polymers that act as carriers for drug delivery or scaffolds for tissue regeneration. When implanted in vivo, biomaterials should be nontoxic and exert intended functions. For tooth regeneration, biomaterials have primarily served as a scaffold for (1) transplanted stem cells and/or (2) recruitment of endogenous stem cells. This article critically synthesizes our knowledge of biomaterial use in tooth regeneration, including the selection of native and/or synthetic polymers, three-dimensional scaffold fabrication, stem cell transplantation, and stem cell homing. A tooth is a complex biological organ. Tooth loss represents the most common organ failure. Tooth regeneration encompasses not only regrowth of an entire tooth as an organ, but also biological restoration of individual components of the tooth including enamel, dentin, cementum, or dental pulp. Regeneration of tooth root represents perhaps more near-term opportunities than the regeneration of the whole tooth. In the adult, a tooth owes its biological vitality, arguably more, to the root than the crown. Biomaterials are indispensible for the regeneration of tooth root, tooth crown, dental pulp, or an entire tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.