Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21699269›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2011

Enhancing CNS repair in neurological disease: challenges arising from neurodegeneration and rewiring of the network.

Xiaohua Xu, Arthur E Warrington, Allan J Bieber, Moses Rodriguez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. 3D Printing for Neural Repair: Bridging the Gap in Regenerative Medicine.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neurotrophic natural products: chemistry and biology.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaohua XuDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Arthur E Warrington
Allan J Bieber
Moses Rodriguez
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

T cell Function in Murine Model of Multiple SclerosisR01NS032129 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUEZ, MOSES · 1994 to 2010
$2.7M
IMMUNE PROMOTION OF REMYELINATIONR01NS024180 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUEZ, MOSES · 1987 to 2008
$2.7M
Promoting Tumor Immunity by Cross-Linking B7-DCR01CA104996 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PEASE, LARRY R · 2004 to 2013
$2.1M
Nanopore Biosensor for Kinetics of Reparative Antibodies on Plasma MembranesR01GM092993 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OH, SANG-HYUN · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
Genetic Analysis of Spontaneous RemyelinationR01NS048357 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BIEBER, ALLAN JAMES · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Potentiating DC Function through B7-DCR01CA096859 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI PEASE, LARRY R · 2003 to 2005
$767k
Clinical Translation of a Neuron Protective Recombinant Human AntibodyR21NS073684 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RODRIGUEZ, MOSES · 2011 to 2012
$434k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096859NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104996NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092993NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS024180NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS032129NINDS NIH HHS R01NS032129NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048357NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS073684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repair of the central nervous system (CNS) constitutes an integral part of treating neurological disease and plays a crucial role in restoring CNS architecture and function. Distinct strategies have been developed to reconstruct the damaged neural tissue, with many tested preclinically in animal models. We review cell replacement-based repair strategies. By taking spinal cord injury, cerebral ischaemia and degenerative CNS disorders as examples for CNS repair, we discuss progress and potential problems in utilizing embryonic stem cells and adult neural/non-neural stem cells to repair cell loss in the CNS. Nevertheless, CNS repair is not simply a matter of cell transplantation. The major challenge is to induce regenerating neural cells to integrate into the neural network and compensate for damaged neural function. The neural cells confront an environment very different from that of the developmental stage in which these cells differentiate to form interwoven networks. During the repair process, one of the challenges is neurodegeneration, which can develop from interrupted innervations to/from the targets, chronic inflammation, ischaemia, aging or idiopathic neural toxicity. Neurodegeneration, which occurs on the basis of a characteristic vascular and neural web, usually presents as a chronically progressive process with unknown aetiology. Currently, there is no effective treatment to stop or slow down neurodegeneration. Pathological changes from patients with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis indicate a broken homeostasis in the CNS. We discuss how the blood-brain barrier and neural networks are formed to maintain CNS homeostasis and their contribution to neurodegeneration in diseased conditions. Another challenge is that some inhibitors produced by CNS injury do not facilitate the regenerating neural cells to incorporate into a pre-existing network. We review glial responses to CNS injury. Of note, the reactive astrocytes not only encompass the lesions/pathogens but may also form glial scars to impede regenerating axons from traversing the lesions. In addition, myelin debris can prevent axon growth. Myelination enables saltatory transduction of electrical impulses along axonal calibers and actually provides trophic support to stabilize the axons. Therefore, repair strategies should be designed to promote axonal growth, myelination and modulate astrocytic responses. Finally, we discuss recent progress in developing human monoclonal IgMs that regulate CNS homeostasis and promote neural regeneration.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System DiseasesHumansNerve NetNeurodegenerative DiseasesStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID21699269
PMCPMC3140701
OpenAlexW263559132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.