ArticlePLoS computational biology2011
Integrative analysis of many weighted co-expression networks using tensor computation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- MetaDCN: meta-analysis framework for differential co-expression network detection with an application in breast cancer.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Identification of blood-brain barrier injury-related biomarkers in cerebral infarction using transcriptomic analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Biclustering data analysis: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Article
- Gene communities in co-expression networks across different tissues.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Multi-Omics Data Analysis Identifies Prognostic Biomarkers across Cancers.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multiview clustering of multi-omics data integration by using a penalty model.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- System Principles Governing the Organization, Architecture, Dynamics, and Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- FINER: enhancing the prediction of tissue-specific functions of isoforms by refining isoform interaction networks.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- RASMA: a reverse search algorithm for mining maximal frequent subgraphs.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Inference for Multiple Heterogeneous Networks with a Common Invariant Subspace.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2021Article
- Exploring Drug Treatment Patterns Based on the Action of Drug and Multilayer Network Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Model-based clustering of multi-tissue gene expression data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.An international journal on information fusion · 2019Article
- Horizontal and vertical integrative analysis methods for mental disorders omics data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Microbiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Feature related multi-view nonnegative matrix factorization for identifying conserved functional modules in multiple biological networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Condition-adaptive fused graphical lasso (CFGL): An adaptive procedure for inferring condition-specific gene co-expression network.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Comparisons of gene coexpression network modules in breast cancer and ovarian cancer.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid accumulation of biological networks poses new challenges and calls for powerful integrative analysis tools. Most existing methods capable of simultaneously analyzing a large number of networks were primarily designed for unweighted networks, and cannot easily be extended to weighted networks. However, it is known that transforming weighted into unweighted networks by dichotomizing the edges of weighted networks with a threshold generally leads to information loss. We have developed a novel, tensor-based computational framework for mining recurrent heavy subgraphs in a large set of massive weighted networks. Specifically, we formulate the recurrent heavy subgraph identification problem as a heavy 3D subtensor discovery problem with sparse constraints. We describe an effective approach to solving this problem by designing a multi-stage, convex relaxation protocol, and a non-uniform edge sampling technique. We applied our method to 130 co-expression networks, and identified 11,394 recurrent heavy subgraphs, grouped into 2,810 families. We demonstrated that the identified subgraphs represent meaningful biological modules by validating against a large set of compiled biological knowledge bases. We also showed that the likelihood for a heavy subgraph to be meaningful increases significantly with its recurrence in multiple networks, highlighting the importance of the integrative approach to biological network analysis. Moreover, our approach based on weighted graphs detects many patterns that would be overlooked using unweighted graphs. In addition, we identified a large number of modules that occur predominately under specific phenotypes. This analysis resulted in a genome-wide mapping of gene network modules onto the phenome. Finally, by comparing module activities across many datasets, we discovered high-order dynamic cooperativeness in protein complex networks and transcriptional regulatory networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.