Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21697370›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

First spike latency code for interaural phase difference discrimination in the guinea pig inferior colliculus.

Oran Zohar, Trevor M Shackleton, Israel Nelken, Alan R Palmer, Maoz Shamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Readout Mechanism for Latency Codes.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Reading spike timing without a clock: intrinsic decoding of spike trains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Ongoing temporal coding of a stochastic stimulus as a function of intensity: time-intensity trading.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  19. Neurons with stereotyped and rapid responses provide a reference frame for relative temporal coding in primate auditory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oran ZoharProgram of Cognitive Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel.
Trevor M Shackleton
Israel Nelken
Alan R Palmer
Maoz Shamir

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First spike latency has been suggested as a source of the information required for fast discrimination tasks. However, the accuracy of such a mechanism has not been analyzed rigorously. Here, we investigate the utility of first spike latency for encoding information about the location of a sound source, based on the responses of inferior colliculus (IC) neurons in the guinea pig to interaural phase differences (IPDs). First spike latencies of many cells in the guinea pig IC show unimodal tuning to stimulus IPD. We investigated the discrimination accuracy of a simple latency code that estimates stimulus IPD from the preferred IPD of the single cell that fired first. Surprisingly, despite being based on only a single spike, the accuracy of the latency code is comparable to that of a conventional rate code computed over the entire response. We show that spontaneous firing limits the capacity of the latency code to accumulate information from large neural populations. This detrimental effect can be overcome by generalizing the latency code to estimate the stimulus IPD from the preferred IPDs of the population of cells that fired the first n spikes. In addition, we show that a good estimate of the neural response time to the stimulus, which can be obtained from the responses of the cells whose response latency is invariant to stimulus identity, limits the detrimental effect of spontaneous firing. Thus, a latency code may provide great improvement in response speed at a small cost to the accuracy of the decision.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleGuinea PigsInferior ColliculiMaleNeuronsSound LocalizationSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID21697370
PMCPMC6623468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.