ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2011
Computational analysis of the structural mechanism of inhibition of chemokine receptor CXCR4 by small molecule antagonists.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-myeloma activity of the CXCR4 antagonist WZ811.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Targeting the chemokine receptor CXCR4 for cancer therapies.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Biological and mutational analyses of CXCR4-antagonist interactions and design of new antagonistic analogs.Bioscience reports · 2023Article
- Computational modeling and experimental validation of the EPI-X4/CXCR4 complex allows rational design of small peptide antagonists.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Co-receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of neuroHIV.Retrovirology · 2021Review
- CXCR4-Binding Positron Emission Tomography Tracers Link Monocyte Recruitment and Endothelial Injury in Murine Atherosclerosis.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021Article
- High affinity CXCR4 inhibitors generated by linking low affinity peptides.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2019Article
- TCR-CXCR4 signaling stabilizes cytokine mRNA transcripts via a PREX1-Rac1 pathway: implications for CTCL.Blood · 2017Article
- Comparison of cell-based assays for the identification and evaluation of competitive CXCR4 inhibitors.PloS one · 2017Article
- Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.Chemical biology & drug design · 2016Article
- Article
- Determination of the binding mode for the cyclopentapeptide CXCR4 antagonist FC131 using a dual approach of ligand modifications and receptor mutagenesis.British journal of pharmacology · 2014Article
- Anti-HIV small-molecule binding in the peptide subpocket of the CXCR4:CVX15 crystal structure.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2014Article
- Drug discovery research targeting the CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4).Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2012Review
- C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12-C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 signaling axis in cancer and the development of chemotherapeutic molecules.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the structural mechanism of receptor-ligand interactions for the chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for determining its physiological and pathological functions and for developing new therapies targeted to CXCR4. We have recently reported a structural mechanism for CXCR4 antagonism by a novel synthetic CXCR4 antagonist RCP168 and compared its effectiveness against the natural agonist SDF-1α. In the present study, using molecular docking, we further investigate the binding modes of another seven small molecules known to act as CXCR4 antagonists. The predicted binding modes were compared with previously published mutagenesis data for two of these (AMD3100 and AMD11070). Four antagonists, including AMD3100, AMD11070, FC131 and KRH-1636, bound in a similar fashion to CXCR4. Two important acidic amino acid residues (Asp262 and Glu288) on CXCR4, previously found essential for AMD3100 binding, were also involved in binding of the other ligands. These four antagonists use a binding site in common with that used by RCP168, which is a novel synthetic derivative of vMIP-II in which the first 10 residues are replaced by D-amino acids. Comparison of binding modes suggested that this binding site is different from the binding region occupied by the N-terminus of SDF-1α, the only known natural ligand of CXCR4. These observations suggest the presence of a ligand-binding site (site A) that co-exists with the agonist (SDF-1α) binding site (site B). The other three antagonists, including MSX123, MSX202 and WZ811, are smaller in size and had very similar binding poses, but binding was quite different from that of AMD3100. These three antagonists bound at both sites A and B, thereby blocking both binding and signaling by SDF-1α.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.