Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21696945›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2011

The role of a midbrain network in competitive stimulus selection.

Shreesh P Mysore, Eric I Knudsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Superior Colliculus Projections Drive Dopamine Neuron Activity and Movement But Not Value.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The visuomotor transformations underlying target-directed behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Identification of movie encoding neurons enables movie recognition AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Visual neurons recognize complex image transformations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution of behavioural control from chordates to primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. The Ecological View of Selective Attention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shreesh P Mysore299 W Campus Drive, Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. shreesh@stanford.edu
Eric I Knudsen

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Visual and Auditory Stimulus SelectionR01EY019179 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KNUDSEN, ERIC · 2008 to 2013
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A midbrain network interacts with the well-known frontoparietal forebrain network to select stimuli for gaze and spatial attention. The midbrain network, containing the superior colliculus (SC; optic tectum, OT, in non-mammalian vertebrates) and the isthmic nuclei, helps evaluate the relative priorities of competing stimuli and encodes them in a topographic map of space. Behavioral experiments in monkeys demonstrate an essential contribution of the SC to stimulus selection when the relative priorities of competing stimuli are similar. Neurophysiological results from the owl OT demonstrate a neural correlate of this essential contribution of the SC/OT. The multi-layered, spatiotopic organization of the midbrain network lends itself to the analysis and modeling of the mechanisms underlying stimulus selection for gaze and spatial attention.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttentionChoice BehaviorDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansMesencephalonNerve NetNeural PathwaysPerceptionPhysical Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID21696945
PMCPMC3177965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.