Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21695575›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular translational research2011

Patient-to-patient variability in autologous pericardial matrix scaffolds for cardiac repair.

Sonya B Seif-Naraghi, Dinah Horn, Pam A Schup-Magoffin, Michael M Madani, Karen L Christman

Open access · greenAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular translational research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Impedimetric Analysis of the Effect of Decellularized Porcine Heart Scaffold on Human Fibrosarcoma, Endothelial, and Cardiomyocyte Cell Lines.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Oxime cross-linked injectable hydrogels for catheter delivery.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonya B Seif-NaraghiUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Dinah Horn
Pam A Schup-Magoffin
Michael M Madani
Karen L Christman
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Engineering a Dynamic Extracellular Matrix MicroenvironmentDP2OD004309 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTMAN, KAREN L · 2008 to 2009
$2.4M
NIH HHS DP2 OD004309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pursuit of alternate therapies for end-stage heart failure post-myocardial infarction has led to the development of a variety of in situ gelling materials to be used as cellular or acellular scaffolds for cardiac repair. Previously, a protocol was established to decellularize human and porcine pericardia and process the extracellular matrix (ECM) into an injectable form. The resulting gels were found to retain components of the native extracellular matrix; cell infiltration was facilitated in vivo, and neovascularization was observed by 2 weeks. However, the assertion that an injectable form of human pericardial tissue could be a potentially autologous scaffold for myocardial tissue engineering requires assessment of the patient-to-patient variability. With this work, seven human pericardia from a relevant patient demographic are processed into injectable matrix materials that gel when brought to physiologic conditions. The resulting materials are compared with respect to their protein composition, glycosaminoglycan content, in vitro degradation, in vivo gelation, and microstructure. It is observed that a diminished collagen content in a subset of samples prevents in vitro gelation but not in vivo gelation at lower ECM concentrations. The structure is similarly fibrous and porous across all samples, implying the cell infiltration may be similarly facilitated. The biochemical composition as characterized by tandem mass spectrometry is comparable; basic ECM components are conserved across all samples, and the presence of a wide variety of ECM proteins and glycoproteins demonstrate the retention of biochemical complexity post-processing. It is concluded that the variability within human pericardial tissue specimens does not prevent them from being processed into injectable scaffolds; therefore, pericardial tissue offers a promising source as an autologous, injectable biomaterial scaffold.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPericardiumRegenerative MedicineExtracellular Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21695575
PMCPMC3280922
OpenAlexW2030749854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.