Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21694971›Full record

ArticleMens sana monographs2011

Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective.

Neeta Mehta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mens sana monographs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. One Health: An epistemological genealogy.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Integrating mental & physical health: Towards a paradigm shift.The Indian journal of medical research · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The importance, consequences and treatment of psychosocial risk factors in heart disease: less conversation, more action!Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Review
  10. "Think positive and don't die alone" - Foreign-born, South Asian older adults' perceptions on healthy aging.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Psychological comorbidity in gastrointestinal diseases: Update on the brain-gut-microbiome axis.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Neeta MehtaAssociate Professor, Department of Psychology, KET's V. G. Vaze College, Mulund East, Mumbai -400 081, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Philosophical theory about the nature of human beings has far reaching consequences on our understanding of various issues faced by them. Once taken as self-evident, it becomes the foundation on which knowledge gets built. The cause of concern is that this theoretical framework rarely gets questioned despite its inherent limitations and self-defeating consequences, leading to crisis in the concerned field. The field, which is facing crisis today, is that of medicine, and the paradigmatic stance that is responsible for the crisis is Cartesian dualism-a view that mind and body are essentially separate entities. This paper discusses Cartesian dualism in the context of the practice of medicine. Focusing more closely on how disease, health and treatment are defined through this position, the paper builds up its critique by throwing light on its accomplishments, limitations and self-defeating consequences. The paper also seeks to understand why this dualism is still alive despite its disavowal from philosophers, health practitioners and lay people.

Indexed as

Cartesian DualismCartesian Dualism and MedicineMind-Body Dualism

Identifiers

PMID21694971
PMCPMC3115289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.