Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21694877›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2008

New simple decontamination method improves microscopic detection and culture of mycobacteria in clinical practice.

Nora Morcillo, Belén Imperiale, Juan Carlos Palomino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of the Copan Myco-TB kit for the decontamination of respiratory samples for the detection of Mycobacteria.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  11. A new diagnostic tool for rapid and accurate detection ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nora MorcilloReference Laboratory of Tuberculosis Control Program of Buenos Aires Province, Dr. Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina;
Belén Imperiale
Juan Carlos Palomino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was carried out at Dr. Cetrángolo Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina. The objective was to compare two digestion-decontamination procedures: the N-acetyl-L-cysteine-sodium citrate-NaOH (NALC-NaOH) and a combination of 7% NaCl plus NaOH, the hypertonic saline-sodium hydroxide (HS-SH) method, in detection and recovery of mycobacteria. Microscopy detection rates before and after concentration of specimens by both methods, were also compared. The study had two phases. Phase I: comparison of the gold standard NALC-NaOH and HS-SH on paired samples involving respiratory clinical specimens by means of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Phase II: blinded, randomized trial to assess the performance of HS-SH versus NALC-NaOH in clinical practice. Phase I: Positive microscopy rate was significantly increased in around 2.2% after concentration in comparison to that of specimens without concentration. The calculated sensitivity values for microscopy detection increased between 15.2% (HS-SH: 73.5%) to 16.7% (NALC-NaOH: 75.0%) over those without concentration (58.3%). Phase II: similar diagnostic rates by microscopy and cultures were obtained by either HS-SH or NALC-NaOH. The clinical performances were also very similar. These results and the low cost of the HS-SH procedure indicate the possibility of its implementation in clinical laboratories with high burden of tuberculosis cases and low resources.

Indexed as

clinical practicediagnosistuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID21694877
PMCPMC3108717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.