ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Priorities for women with lymphoedema after treatment for breast cancer: population based cohort study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing the Short-Form of Lymphedema Needs Questionnaire for Iranian Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Total saponins of panaxnotoginseng promotes lymphangiogenesis by activation VEGF-C expression of lymphatic endothelial cells.Journal of ethnopharmacology · 2016Article
- Lymphatic mapping and preoperative imaging in the management of post-mastectomy lymphoedema.Gland surgery · 2016Article
- Exercise barriers self-efficacy: development and validation of a subcale for individuals with cancer-related lymphedema.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2015Article
- How people construct their experience of living with secondary lymphoedema in the context of their everyday lives in Australia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013Article
- Lymphedema and therapeutic lymphangiogenesis.BioMed research international · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the perceived unmet needs among women treated for breast cancer and in whom symptoms and signs indicate the presence of lymphoedema.
designPopulation based cross sectional survey with a purpose designed questionnaire (60 items).
settingCancer registries of New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia.
participants237 women with symptoms and signs indicative of lymphoedema from an initial 1930 eligible women.
main outcome measureUnmet needs in the previous month across psychological, health system and information, physical and daily living, patient care and support, sexuality needs, body image, and financial domains.
resultsThe 10 items most commonly identified as a "moderate to high current need" included having their doctor and allied health workers being fully informed about lymphoedema, acknowledge the seriousness of the condition, and be willing to treat it. Women also wanted access to up to date treatments, both mainstream and alternative, and financial assistance for their garments. The three factors that explained most of the variance were: information and support (11 items), which accounted for 49% of the variance; body image and self esteem (seven items; 7% variance); and health system (seven items; 5% variance). Examination of these three factors showed that while the levels of need were generally low, they were common.
conclusionTo address the needs of women with lymphoedema and perhaps to prevent progression of lymphoedema, it is important that practitioners do not dismiss mild symptoms and that women are referred to an appropriate specialist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.