Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21693522›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2011

How to make stripes: deciphering the transition from non-periodic to periodic patterns in Drosophila segmentation.

Mark D Schroeder, Christina Greer, Ulrike Gaul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of Interaction between Enhancers and Promoters in ThreeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark D SchroederLaboratory of Developmental Neurogenetics, Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Christina Greer
Ulrike Gaul

Funding

Decoding transcriptional control in higher eukaryotesR33GM066434 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI SIGGIA, ERIC D. · 2003 to 2005
$1.3M
Decoding transcriptional control in higher eukaryotesR21GM066434 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI SIGGIA, ERIC D. · 2002 to 2002
$167k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066434NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066434NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of metameric body plans is a key process in development. In Drosophila segmentation, periodicity is established rapidly through the complex transcriptional regulation of the pair-rule genes. The 'primary' pair-rule genes generate their 7-stripe expression through stripe-specific cis-regulatory elements controlled by the preceding non-periodic maternal and gap gene patterns, whereas 'secondary' pair-rule genes are thought to rely on 7-stripe elements that read off the already periodic primary pair-rule patterns. Using a combination of computational and experimental approaches, we have conducted a comprehensive systems-level examination of the regulatory architecture underlying pair-rule stripe formation. We find that runt (run), fushi tarazu (ftz) and odd skipped (odd) establish most of their pattern through stripe-specific elements, arguing for a reclassification of ftz and odd as primary pair-rule genes. In the case of run, we observe long-range cis-regulation across multiple intervening genes. The 7-stripe elements of run, ftz and odd are active concurrently with the stripe-specific elements, indicating that maternal/gap-mediated control and pair-rule gene cross-regulation are closely integrated. Stripe-specific elements fall into three distinct classes based on their principal repressive gap factor input; stripe positions along the gap gradients correlate with the strength of predicted input. The prevalence of cis-elements that generate two stripes and their genomic organization suggest that single-stripe elements arose by splitting and subfunctionalization of ancestral dual-stripe elements. Overall, our study provides a greatly improved understanding of how periodic patterns are established in the Drosophila embryo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBody PatterningDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenotypeHomeodomain ProteinsIn Situ HybridizationNuclear ProteinsPeriodicityTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsftz protein, DrosophilaFushi Tarazu Transcription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsNuclear ProteinsOpa protein, Drosophilarun protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21693522
PMCPMC3119311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.