ArticlePaediatric drugs2011
Pediatric clinical trials in Latin America and Guyana: present views of local practitioners and ways to embrace the future.
Article in Paediatric drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engagement of the community, traditional leaders, and public health system in the design and implementation of a large community-based, cluster-randomized trial of umbilical cord care in Zambia.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2015Trial
- A quarter century of progress in paediatric clinical pharmacology: A personal view.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Impact, challenges, and future projections of vaccine trials in Africa.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2013Review
- Pediatric clinical trials.Perspectives in clinical research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobal pediatric research has recently received increased attention by health professionals, and research and government institutions. Since the approval of the FDA Pediatric Exclusivity Provision and the EU Paediatric Regulation, pharmaceutical companies have begun to look to developing/transitional countries for international pediatric research collaboration as a way of facilitating the recruitment of patients to clinical trials. Among countries identified as being 'developing/transitional' some were in the North, Central, and South American regions. OBJECTIVE AND
methodsThe aim of this study was to ascertain views from local practitioners on awareness and understanding of pediatric clinical research and to clarify resources and training required by pediatricians engaging in such research in the North, Central, and South American regions. A brief survey was disseminated via Sociedad Iberoamericana de Neonatología (SIBEN) and several other randomly selected pediatric institutions. This survey provided information for a Paediatric Global Research meeting at WorldPharma 2010 (Copenhagen, Denmark).
resultsPediatricians (n = 55) from seven countries in Latin America and Guyana replied to the survey. They appeared to be enthusiastic about embracing the opportunity to participate in meaningful research to improve treatment of children worldwide. However, some challenges remain to be addressed around good clinical practice in the conduct of trials, education, and training of professionals, and the availability and use of resources.
conclusionThe survey indicated a considerable depth of interest in the improvement of the pediatric clinical research environment in Latin America. There is some momentum toward the development of a Latin American network for the facilitation and supervision of pediatric clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21692549What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.