ArticlePharmaceutical research2011
Ocular pharmacokinetic study using T₁ mapping and Gd-chelate- labeled polymers.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular Biodistribution Studies using Molecular Imaging.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- MRI study of subconjunctival and intravitreal injections.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecent advances in drug discovery have led to the development of a number of therapeutic macromolecules for treatment of posterior eye diseases. We aimed to investigate the clearance of macromolecular contrast probes (polymers conjugated with Gd-chelate) in the vitreous after intravitreal injections with the recently developed ms-DSEPI-T12 MRI and to examine the degradation of disulfide-containing biodegradable polymers in the vitreous humor in vivo.
methodsIntravitreal injections of model contrast agents poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide]-GG-1,6-hexanediamine-(Gd-DO3A), biodegradable (Gd-DTPA)-cystine copolymers, and MultiHance were performed in rabbits; their distribution and elimination from the vitreous after injections were determined by MRI.
resultsTimes for macromolecular contrast agents to decrease to half their initial concentrations in the vitreous ranged from 0.4-1.3 days post-injection. Non-biodegradable polymers demonstrated slower vitreal clearance than those of disulfide-biodegradable polymers. Biodegradable polymers had similar clearance as MultiHance.
conclusionsUsefulness of T(1) mapping and ms-DSEPI-T12 MRI to study ocular pharmacokinetics was demonstrated. Results suggest an enzymatic degradation mechanism for the disulfide linkage in polymers in the vitreous leading to breakup of polymers in vitreous humor over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.