Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21691441›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2011

Functional polymers in protein detection platforms: optical, electrochemical, electrical, mass-sensitive, and magnetic biosensors.

Jong-in Hahm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A mechanistic examination of salting out in protein-polymer membrane interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Recent Advances in Magnetic Microfluidic Biosensors.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. A Polyaniline-based Sensor of Nucleic Acids.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors.Analytical chemistry · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jong-in HahmDepartment of Chemistry, Georgetown University, 37th & O Sts. NW., Washington, DC 20057, USA. jh583@georgetown.edu

Funding

ZnO Nanorod-based Early Biomarker Screening for Acute Kidney InjuryR01DK088016 · NIDDK · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HAHM, JONG-IN · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01DK088016-01NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK088016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly growing field of proteomics and related applied sectors in the life sciences demands convenient methodologies for detecting and measuring the levels of specific proteins as well as for screening and analyzing for interacting protein systems. Materials utilized for such protein detection and measurement platforms should meet particular specifications which include ease-of-mass manufacture, biological stability, chemical functionality, cost effectiveness, and portability. Polymers can satisfy many of these requirements and are often considered as choice materials in various biological detection platforms. Therefore, tremendous research efforts have been made for developing new polymers both in macroscopic and nanoscopic length scales as well as applying existing polymeric materials for protein measurements. In this review article, both conventional and alternative techniques for protein detection are overviewed while focusing on the use of various polymeric materials in different protein sensing technologies. Among many available detection mechanisms, most common approaches such as optical, electrochemical, electrical, mass-sensitive, and magnetic methods are comprehensively discussed in this article. Desired properties of polymers exploited for each type of protein detection approach are summarized. Current challenges associated with the application of polymeric materials are examined in each protein detection category. Difficulties facing both quantitative and qualitative protein measurements are also identified. The latest efforts on the development and evaluation of nanoscale polymeric systems for improved protein detection are also discussed from the standpoint of quantitative and qualitative measurements. Finally, future research directions towards further advancements in the field are considered.

Indexed as

ElectricityBiosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesMagneticsOptics and PhotonicsPolymersProteinsPolymersProteinsnanotechnologypolymer in sensorprotein detectionprotein sensorsensor materials

Identifiers

PMID21691441
PMCPMC3117287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.