Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21691433›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational physics2011

MIB method for elliptic equations with multi-material interfaces.

Kelin Xia, Meng Zhan, Guo-Wei Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Matched Interface and Boundary Method for Elasticity Interface Problems.Journal of computational and applied mathematics · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. MIB Galerkin method for elliptic interface problems.Journal of computational and applied mathematics · 2014
    Article
  5. A Galerkin formulation of the MIB method for three dimensional elliptic interface problems.Computers & mathematics with applications (Oxford, England : 1987) · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Variational multiscale models for charge transport.SIAM review. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kelin XiaWuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China.
Meng Zhan
Guo-Wei Wei

Funding

Collaborative research: Geometric flow approach to implicit solvation modelingR01GM090208 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WEI, GUOWEI · 2009 to 2014
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elliptic partial differential equations (PDEs) are widely used to model real-world problems. Due to the heterogeneous characteristics of many naturally occurring materials and man-made structures, devices, and equipments, one frequently needs to solve elliptic PDEs with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources. The development of high-order elliptic interface schemes has been an active research field for decades. However, challenges remain in the construction of high-order schemes and particularly, for nonsmooth interfaces, i.e., interfaces with geometric singularities. The challenge of geometric singularities is amplified when they are originated from two or more material interfaces joining together or crossing each other. High-order methods for elliptic equations with multi-material interfaces have not been reported in the literature to our knowledge. The present work develops matched interface and boundary (MIB) method based schemes for solving two-dimensional (2D) elliptic PDEs with geometric singularities of multi-material interfaces. A number of new MIB schemes are constructed to account for all possible topological variations due to two-material interfaces. The geometric singularities of three-material interfaces are significantly more difficult to handle. Three new MIB schemes are designed to handle a variety of geometric situations and topological variations, although not all of them. The performance of the proposed new MIB schemes is validated by numerical experiments with a wide range of coefficient contrasts, geometric singularities, and solution types. Extensive numerical studies confirm the designed second order accuracy of the MIB method for multi-material interfaces, including a case where the derivative of the solution diverges.

Identifiers

PMID21691433
PMCPMC3117633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.