ArticlePersonalized medicine2011
Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.
Article in Personalized medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Pediatric biobanks to enhance clinical and translational research for children.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Review
- Paediatric biobanking for health: The ethical, legal, and societal landscape.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Sharing and Safeguarding Pediatric Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Ethical and deontological aspects of pediatric biobanks: the situation in Italy.Cell and tissue banking · 2020Article
- Willingness of women to participate in obstetrical and pediatric research involving biobanks.Journal of community genetics · 2020Article
- Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree.BMC medical ethics · 2018Article
- Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2018Article
- When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.The Journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
- Mapping the Ethics of Translational Genomics: Situating Return of Results and Navigating the Research-Clinical Divide.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2015Article
- Secondary use of clinical data: the Vanderbilt approach.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- 'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?Science and engineering ethics · 2014Article
- Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013Article
- Patient awareness and approval for an opt-out genomic biorepository.Personalized medicine · 2013Article
- Inclusion of pediatric samples in an opt-out biorepository linking DNA to de-identified medical records: pediatric BioVU.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2013Article
- Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2012Article
- The Informed Cohort Oversight Board: From Values to Architecture.Minnesota journal of law, science & technology · 2012Article
- Parental Perspectives on a Pediatric Human Non-Subjects Biobank.AJOB primary research · 2012Article
- Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2011Article
- Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion.Human genetics · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric biobanks are an indispensible resource for the research that will be needed to bring advances in personalized medicine into pediatric medical care. Investigators developing pediatric biobanks have struggled with the ethical and legal challenges that arise in pediatric research. This article explores how one biobank model, the 'human nonsubjects models', is able to respond to such common challenges as the role of the parent and the child in agreeing to research participation, reconsent at the age of majority, data sharing and return of research results. Although this approach does not involve formal informed consent, it is well-suited to pediatric biobanking owing to its potential to reduce risk to children through a combination of advanced deidentification techniques and extensive oversight.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.