Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21691207›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP)2011

Adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations for female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Michael A Campitelli, Anna M Chiarelli, Lucia Mirea, Lindsay Stewart, Gord Glendon, Paul Ritvo, Irene L Andrulis, Julia A Knight

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The transtheoretical model, health belief model, and breast cancer screening among Iranian women with a family history of breast cancer.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael A CampitelliPrevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Anna M Chiarelli
Lucia Mirea
Lindsay Stewart
Gord Glendon
Paul Ritvo
Irene L Andrulis
Julia A Knight

Funding

ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL BREAST CANCERU01CA069467 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE L. · 1995 to 2010
$10.4M
NCI NIH HHS RFA-CA-06-503NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069467NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening recommendations among a population cohort of women at familial risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer. This cross-sectional study included 1039 first-degree female relatives without breast cancer identified from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. We compared breast and ovarian cancer screening behaviors, using a telephone-administered questionnaire among three groups of women defined by their familial risk (high, moderate, and low) of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Associations between screening behaviors and familial risk were assessed using multinomial regression models adjusted by familial clustering. Women, 40-49 years of age, at moderate or high familial risk were significantly more likely to have had a screening mammogram within the past 12 months [odds ratio (OR): 2.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.40-5.58], and women of less than 50 years of age were more likely to have a clinical breast examination (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.02-3.31) compared with women at low familial risk. Compared with women at low or moderate familial risk, women at high familial risk were significantly more likely to have ever had a genetic test for the BRCA 1/2 genes (OR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.76-4.05). Although the overall level of adherence among high-risk women is suboptimal in the community, women at a higher familial risk are adhering more often to cancer screening recommendations than women at a lower familial risk.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceRegistriesAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMammographyMiddle AgedOntarioOvarian NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21691207
PMCPMC3179806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.