Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21691206›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2011

Pregnancy history and risk of endometrial cancer.

Gaia Pocobelli, Jennifer A Doherty, Lynda F Voigt, Shirley A Beresford, Deirdre A Hill, Chu Chen, Mary Anne Rossing, Rebecca S Holmes, Zorawar S Noor, Noel S Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gaia PocobelliDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. gpocobel@u.washington.edu
Jennifer A Doherty
Lynda F Voigt
Shirley A Beresford
Deirdre A Hill
Chu Chen
Mary Anne Rossing
Rebecca S Holmes
Zorawar S Noor
Noel S Weiss
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer:New HypothesesR01CA087538 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ROSSING, MARY ANNE · 2002 to 2006
$3.5M
Molecular Epidemiology of Endometrial CancerR01CA105212 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI CHEN, CHU · 2004 to 2007
$2.2M
Title OmittedK05CA092002 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEISS, NOEL S · 2002 to 2013
$1.5M
BREAST CANCER AND THE BIRTH CONTROL PILL-275923166N01HD023166 · NICHD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · 1992 to 2003
$1.4M
ENDOMETRIAL CANCER AND POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONE THERAPYR01CA075977 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WEISS, NOEL · 1998 to 2001
$687k
ENDOMETRIAL CANCER RISK AND POSTMENOPAUSAL HORMONE USER01CA047749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BERESFORD, SHIRLEY AA · 1989 to 1994
–
BREAST CANCER AND THE BIRTH CONTROL PILL-275923166N01HD923166 · NICHD · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARC · PI DALING, JANET R · 2006 to 2006
–
RESEARCH IN CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGYR35CA039779 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WEISS, NOEL · 1985 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA092002NCI NIH HHS K05 CA92002NCI NIH HHS R01 CA047749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA075977NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087538NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105212NCI NIH HHS R01 CA75977NCI NIH HHS R01 CA87538NCI NIH HHS R35 CA039779NCI NIH HHS R35 CA39779NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD023166NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD 23166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiologic studies are consistent in finding that women who have had at least one birth are less likely to develop endometrial cancer. Less clear is whether timing of pregnancies during reproductive life influences risk, and the degree to which incomplete pregnancies are associated with a reduced risk.

methodsWe evaluated pregnancy history in relation to endometrial cancer risk using data from a series of 4 population-based endometrial cancer case-control studies of women 45-74 years of age (1712 cases and 2134 controls) during 1985-2005 in western Washington State. Pregnancy history and information on other potential risk factors were collected by in-person interviews.

resultsOlder age at first birth was associated with a reduced risk of endometrial cancer after adjustment for number of births and age at last birth (test for trend P = 0.004). The odds ratio comparing women at least 35 years of age at their first birth with those younger than 20 years was 0.34 (95% confidence interval = 0.14-0.84). Age at last birth was not associated with risk after adjustment for number of births and age at first birth (test for trend P = 0.830). Overall, a history of incomplete pregnancies was not associated with endometrial cancer risk to any appreciable degree.

conclusionsIn this study, older age at first birth was more strongly associated with endometrial cancer risk than was older age at last birth. To date, there remains some uncertainty in the literature on this issue.

Indexed as

Reproductive HistoryAdenocarcinomaAgedAge FactorsCase-Control StudiesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioParityPopulation SurveillancePregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21691206
PMCPMC3152311
OpenAlexW2072242182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.