Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21690475›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2011

Randomized multicenter trial of the effects of melanoma-associated helper peptides and cyclophosphamide on the immunogenicity of a multipeptide melanoma vaccine.

Craig L Slingluff, Gina R Petroni, Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock, Mark E Smolkin, Merrick I Ross, Naomi B Haas, Margaret von Mehren, William W Grosh

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00118274 (A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Administration of Cyclophosphamide and Melanoma-Derived Helper Peptides on the Immunogenicity of a Class I MHC-Restricted Peptide-Based Vaccine in Participants With Resected Melanoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00118274 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Administration of Cyclophosphamide and Melanoma-Derived Helper Peptides on the Immunogenicity of a Class I MHC-Restricted Peptide-Based Vaccine in Participants With Resected Melanoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCraig L Slingluff, JrRan2005 to 2010Enrolled170ConditionsMelanoma (Skin)Armsincomplete Freund's adjuvant, melanoma helper peptide vaccine, multi-epitope melanoma peptide vaccine, tetanus toxoid helper peptide, cyclophosphamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Clinical activity and safety of combination therapy with temsirolimus and bevacizumab for advanced melanoma: a phase II trial (CTEP 7190/Mel47).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Trial

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Craig L SlingluffDepartment of Surgery, Human Immune Therapy Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. cls8h@virginia.edu
Gina R Petroni
Kimberly A Chianese-Bullock
Mark E Smolkin
Merrick I Ross
Naomi B Haas
Margaret von Mehren
William W Grosh
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
ZACOPRIDE VS METOCLOPRAMIDE--EFFECT ON LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTERM01RR000847 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI BRETON, MARC D · 1985 to 2010
$48.1M
Multi-peptide Vaccine Administered with Cyclophosphamide for High-risk MelanomaR01CA118386 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS P30 CA44579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118386NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000847NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR00847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis multicenter randomized trial was designed to test whether melanoma-associated helper peptides augment CD8(+) T-cell responses to a melanoma vaccine and whether cyclophosphamide (CY) pretreatment augments CD4(+) or CD8(+) T-cell responses to that vaccine. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn all, 167 eligible patients with resected stage IIB to IV melanoma were randomly assigned to four vaccination study arms. Patients were vaccinated with 12 class I major histocompatibility complex-restricted melanoma peptides (12MP) to stimulate CD8(+) T cells and were randomly assigned to receive a tetanus helper peptide or a mixture of six melanoma-associated helper peptides (6MHP) to stimulate CD4(+) T cells. Before vaccination, patients were also randomly assigned to receive CY pretreatment or not. T-cell responses were assessed by an ex vivo interferon gamma ELISpot assay. Clinical outcomes and toxicities were recorded.

resultsVaccination with 12MP plus tetanus induced CD8(+) T-cell responses in 78% of patients and CD4(+) T-cell responses to tetanus peptide in 93% of patients. Vaccination with 12MP plus 6MHP induced CD8(+) responses in 19% of patients and CD4(+) responses to 6MHP in 48% of patients. CY had no significant effect on T-cell responses. Overall 3-year survival was 79% (95% CI, 71% to 86%), with no significant differences (at this point) by study arm.

conclusionMelanoma-associated helper peptides paradoxically decreased CD8(+) T-cell responses to a melanoma vaccine (P < .001), and CY pretreatment had no immunologic or clinical effect. Prior work showed immunologic and clinical activity of 6MHP alone. Possible explanations for negative effects on CD8 responses include modulation of homing receptor expression or induction of antigen-specific regulatory T cells.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMelanoma-Specific AntigensMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAdjuvants, ImmunologicCancer VaccinesCyclophosphamideInterferon-gammaMelanoma-Specific AntigensPeptidesTetanus Toxin

Identifiers

PMID21690475
PMCPMC3138719
OpenAlexW2162771736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.