Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21690279›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Antimicrobial susceptibility to azithromycin among Salmonella enterica isolates from the United States.

Maria Sjölund-Karlsson, Kevin Joyce, Karen Blickenstaff, Takiyah Ball, Jovita Haro, Felicita M Medalla, Paula Fedorka-Cray, Shaohua Zhao, John A Crump, Jean M Whichard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic analysis of azithromycin-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. NontyphoidalOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence of Chromosomally LocatedMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Characterization ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Sjölund-KarlssonNational Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CCID/NCZVED/DFBMD/EDLB, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. fwt4@cdc.gov
Kevin Joyce
Karen Blickenstaff
Takiyah Ball
Jovita Haro
Felicita M Medalla
Paula Fedorka-Cray
Shaohua Zhao
John A Crump
Jean M Whichard
Agricultural Research Service · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenter for Veterinary Medicine · USWaterborne Environmental (United States) · US

Funding

The Impact and Society Ecology of Bacterial Zoonoses in Northern Tanzania: UnderR01TW009237 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CRUMP, JOHN ANDREW · 2011 to 2014
$1.7M
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW009237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to emerging resistance to traditional antimicrobial agents, such as ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and chloramphenicol, azithromycin is increasingly used for the treatment of invasive Salmonella infections. In the present study, 696 isolates of non-Typhi Salmonella collected from humans, food animals, and retail meats in the United States were investigated for antimicrobial susceptibility to azithromycin. Seventy-two Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi isolates from humans were also tested. For each isolate, MICs of azithromycin and 15 other antimicrobial agents were determined by broth microdilution. Among the non-Typhi Salmonella isolates, azithromycin MICs among human isolates ranged from 1 to 32 μg/ml, whereas the MICs among the animal and retail meat isolates ranged from 2 to 16 μg/ml and 4 to 16 μg/ml, respectively. Among Salmonella serotype Typhi isolates, the azithromycin MICs ranged from 4 to 16 μg/ml. The highest MIC observed in the present study was 32 μg/ml, and it was detected in three human isolates belonging to serotypes Kentucky, Montevideo, and Paratyphi A. Based on our findings, we propose an epidemiological cutoff value (ECOFF) for wild-type Salmonella of ≤16 μg/ml of azithromycin. The susceptibility data provided could be used in combination with clinical outcome data to determine tentative clinical breakpoints for azithromycin and Salmonella enterica.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSalmonella entericaUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID21690279
PMCPMC3165283
OpenAlexW2114796784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.