Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21689713›Full record

Trial reportProgress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry2011

Effects of haloperidol on cognition in schizophrenia patients depend on baseline performance: a saccadic eye movement study.

Shelly L Babin, Ashley J Hood, Adel A Wassef, Nina G Williams, Saumil S Patel, Anne B Sereno

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Oculomotor executive function abnormalities with increased tic severity in Tourette syndrome.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shelly L BabinDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, United States.
Ashley J Hood
Adel A Wassef
Nina G Williams
Saumil S Patel
Anne B Sereno

Funding

VISION RESEARCHP30EY010608 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MASSEY, STEPHEN C · 1994 to 2014
$7.9M
Neural substrates of attention and orientingR01MH065492 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI SERENO, ANNE B · 2003 to 2007
$1.4M
Training in NeuroplasticityT32NS041226 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI WAXHAM, M. NEAL · 2001 to 2005
$748k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010608NEI NIH HHS P30EY010608NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065492NINDS NIH HHS 5T32 NS41226NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenic patients are heterogeneous with respect to voluntary eye movement performance, with some showing impairment (e.g., high antisaccade error rates) and others having intact performance. To investigate how this heterogeneity may correlate with different cognitive outcomes after treatment, we used a prosaccade and antisaccade task to investigate the effects of haloperidol in schizophrenic subjects at three time points: baseline (before medication), 3-5 days post-medication, and 12-14 days post-medication. We also investigated changes on the Stroop Task and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in these same subjects. Results were compared to matched controls. When considered as a single patient group, haloperidol had no effects across sessions on reflexive and voluntary saccadic eye movements of schizophrenic patients. In contrast, the performance of the Control group improved slightly but significantly across sessions on the voluntary eye movement task. When each subject was considered separately, interestingly, for schizophrenic patients change in voluntary eye movement performance across sessions depended on the baseline performance in a non-monotonic manner. That is, there was maximal worsening of voluntary eye movement performance at an intermediate level of baseline performance and the worsening decreased on either side of this intermediate baseline level. When patients were divided into categorical subgroups (nonimpaired and impaired), consistent with the non-monotonic relationship, haloperidol worsened voluntary eye movement performance in the nonimpaired patients and improved performance in the impaired patients. These results were only partially reflected in the Stroop Test. Both patient subgroups showed clinically significant improvement over time as measured by the PANSS. These findings suggest that haloperidol has different effects on cognitive performance in impaired and nonimpaired schizophrenic patients that are not evident in clinical ratings based on the PANSS. Given that good cognitive function is important for long-term prognosis and that there is heterogeneity in schizophrenia, these findings are critical for optimal evaluation and treatment of schizophrenic patients.

Indexed as

AdultAntipsychotic AgentsCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleHaloperidolHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSaccadesSchizophreniaYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidol

Identifiers

PMID21689713
PMCPMC3169101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.