Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21689601›Full record

ArticleNeuron2011

Internal structure of the fly elementary motion detector.

Hubert Eichner, Maximilian Joesch, Bettina Schnell, Dierk F Reiff, Alexander Borst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Voltage to Calcium Transformation Enhances Direction Selectivity inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. How fly neurons compute the direction of visual motion.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hubert EichnerDepartment of Systems and Computational Neurobiology, Max-Planck-Institute of Neurobiology, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Maximilian Joesch
Bettina Schnell
Dierk F Reiff
Alexander Borst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent experiments have shown that motion detection in Drosophila starts with splitting the visual input into two parallel channels encoding brightness increments (ON) or decrements (OFF). This suggests the existence of either two (ON-ON, OFF-OFF) or four (for all pairwise interactions) separate motion detectors. To decide between these possibilities, we stimulated flies using sequences of ON and OFF brightness pulses while recording from motion-sensitive tangential cells. We found direction-selective responses to sequences of same sign (ON-ON, OFF-OFF), but not of opposite sign (ON-OFF, OFF-ON), refuting the existence of four separate detectors. Based on further measurements, we propose a model that reproduces a variety of additional experimental data sets, including ones that were previously interpreted as support for four separate detectors. Our experiments and the derived model mark an important step in guiding further dissection of the fly motion detection circuit.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDipteraElectrophysiologyMotion PerceptionNeuronsReaction TimeSignal TransductionVisual Pathways

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.