Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21689536›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2011

Modelling of lysozyme binding to a cation exchange surface at atomic detail: the role of flexibility.

Alexander Steudle, Jürgen Pleiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexander SteudleInstitute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Jürgen Pleiss

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different approaches were made to predict the adsorbed orientation based on rigid, flexible, or a mixture of both models. To determine the role of flexibility during adsorption, the orientation of lysozyme adsorbed to a negatively charged ligand surface was predicted by a rigid and a flexible model based on two differing protein structures at atomic resolution. For the rigid model, the protein structures were placed at different distances from the ligand surface and the electrostatic interaction energy was calculated for all possible orientations. The results were compared to a flexible model where the binding to the ligand surface was modeled by multiple molecular dynamics simulations starting with 14 initial orientations. Different aspects of the adsorption process were not covered by the rigid model and only detectable by the flexible model. Whereas the results of the rigid model depended sensitively on the protein-surface distance and the protein structure, the preferred orientation obtained by the flexible model was closer to a previous experimental determined orientation, robust toward the initial orientation and independent of the initial protein structure. Additionally, it was possible to obtain insights into the preferred binding process of lysozyme on a negatively charged surface by the flexible model.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularAnimalsCationsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMuramidasePliabilityProtein BindingSurface PropertiesThermodynamicsCationshen egg lysozymeMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID21689536
PMCPMC3123928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.