Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21689230›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2011

The role of laparoscopic staging in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer.

Jean M Butte, Mithat Gönen, Peter J Allen, Michael I D'Angelica, T Peter Kingham, Yuman Fong, Ronald P Dematteo, Leslie Blumgart, William R Jarnagin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Incidental Gallbladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Gallbladder cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Surgical management of biliary malignancy.Current problems in surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. BRAZILIAN CONSENSUS ON INCIDENTAL GALLBLADDER CARCINOMA.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jean M ButteDepartments of Surgery Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mithat Gönen
Peter J Allen
Michael I D'Angelica
T Peter Kingham
Yuman Fong
Ronald P Dematteo
Leslie Blumgart
William R Jarnagin
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of staging laparoscopy (SL) in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is ill defined. This study evaluates the utility of SL with the aim of identifying variables associated with disseminated disease (DD).

methodsConsecutive patients with IGBC who underwent re-exploration between 1998 and 2009 were identified from a prospective database. The yield and accuracy of SL were calculated. Demographics, tumour- and treatment-related variables were correlated with findings of DD.

resultsOf the 136 patients submitted to re-exploration for possible definitive resection, 19 (14.0%) had DD. Staging laparoscopy was carried out in 46 (33.8%) patients, of whom 10 (21.8%) had DD (peritoneal disease [n = 6], liver metastases [n = 3], retroperitoneal disease [n = 1]). Disseminated disease was identified by SL in two patients (yield = 4.3%), whereas eight were diagnosed after conversion to laparotomy (accuracy = 20.0%). The likelihood of DD correlated closely with T-stage (T1b, n = 0; T2, n = 5 [7.0%], T3, n = 14 [26.0%]; P = 0.004). A positive margin at initial cholecystectomy (odds ratio [OR] 5.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-24.37; P = 0.004) and tumour differentiation (OR 7.64, 95% CI 1.1-NA; P= 0.006) were independent predictors of DD on multivariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Disseminated disease is relatively uncommon in patients with IGBC and SL provides a very low yield. However, patients with poorly differentiated, T3 or positive-margin gallbladder tumours are at high risk for DD and targeting these patients may increase the yield of SL.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceIncidental FindingsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingReoperationSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID21689230
PMCPMC3133713
OpenAlexW2060226667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.