Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21689142›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following maintenance doses of prasugrel and clopidogrel in Chinese carriers of CYP2C19 variants.

Ronan P Kelly, Sandra L Close, Nagy A Farid, Kenneth J Winters, Lei Shen, Fanni Natanegara, Joseph A Jakubowski, Mary Ho, Joseph R Walker, David S Small

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Circulation · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Pharmacogenetics of Antiplatelet Therapy.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Roles of CYP2C19 Gene Polymorphisms in Susceptibility to POAG and Individual Differences in Drug Treatment Response.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ronan P KellyLilly-NUS Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Singapore. ronan.kelly@lilly.com
Sandra L Close
Nagy A Farid
Kenneth J Winters
Lei Shen
Fanni Natanegara
Joseph A Jakubowski
Mary Ho
Joseph R Walker
David S Small
Eli Lilly (United States) · USClinical Nutrition Research Centre · SGDaiichi Sankyo (United States) · USEli Lilly (Singapore) · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis open-label, two-period, randomized, crossover study was designed to determine the effect of CYP2C19 reduced function variants on exposure to active metabolites of, and platelet response to, prasugrel and clopidogrel.

methodsNinety healthy Chinese subjects, stratified by CYP2C19 phenotype, were randomly assigned to treatment with prasugrel 10 mg or clopidogrel 75 mg for 10 days followed by 14 day washout and 10 day treatment with the other drug. Eighty-three subjects completed both treatment periods. Blood samples were collected at specified time points for measurement of each drug's active metabolite (Pras-AM and Clop-AM) concentrations and determination of inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) by light transmittance aggregometry. CYP2C19 genotypes were classified into three predicted phenotype groups: rapid metabolizers [RMs (*1/*1)], heterozygous or intermediate metabolizers [IMs (*1/*2, *1/*3)] and poor metabolizers [PMs (*2/*2, *2/*3)].

resultsPras-AM exposure was similar in IMs and RMs (90% CI 0.85, 1.03) and slightly lower in PMs than IMs (90% CI 0.74, 0.99), whereas Clop-AM exposure was significantly lower in IMs compared with RMs (90% CI 0.62, 0.83), and in PMs compared with IMs (90% CI 0.53, 0.82). IPA was more consistent among RMs, IMs and PMs in prasugrel treated subjects (80.2%, 84.2% and 80.2%, respectively) than in clopidogrel treated subjects (59.7%, 56.2% and 36.8%, respectively; P < 0.001).

conclusionsPrasugrel demonstrated higher active metabolite exposure and more consistent pharmacodynamic response across all three predicted phenotype groups compared with clopidogrel, confirming observations from previous research that CYP2C19 phenotype plays an important role in variability of response to clopidogrel, but has no impact on response to prasugrel.

Indexed as

AdultAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesBlood PlateletsClopidogrelCross-Over StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Dose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansMalePedigreePiperazinesPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPolymorphism, GeneticAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesClopidogrelCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19PiperazinesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochloridePurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsThiophenesTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID21689142
PMCPMC3248259
OpenAlexW1518311777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.