Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21687786›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical biology2010

The two-mutant problem: clonal interference in evolutionary graph theory.

Chris Paley, Sergei Taraskin, Stephen Elliott

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fixation properties of multiple cooperator configurations on regular graphs.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris PaleyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK.
Sergei Taraskin
Stephen Elliott
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In large asexual populations, clonal interference, whereby different beneficial mutations compete to fix in the population simultaneously, may be the norm. Results extrapolated from the spread of individual mutations in homogeneous backgrounds are found to be misleading in such situations: clonal interference severely inhibits the spread of beneficial mutations. In contrast with results gained in systems with just one mutation striving for fixation at any one time, the spatial structure of the population is found to be an important factor in determining the fixation probability when there are two beneficial mutations.

Indexed as

Beneficial mutationsClonal interferenceFixation probabilitySpatial population

Identifiers

PMID21687786
PMCPMC2957889
OpenAlexW2056502864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.