Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21687779›Full record

ArticleIEEE reviews in biomedical engineering2009

Computational Models for Neuromuscular Function.

Francisco J Valero-Cuevas, Heiko Hoffmann, Manish U Kurse, Jason J Kutch, Evangelos A Theodorou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Numerical instability of Hill-type muscle models.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Review
  12. Neuromuscular control: from a biomechanist's perspective.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Review
  13. "Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Heiko Hoffmann
Manish U Kurse
Jason J Kutch
Evangelos A Theodorou

Funding

Structure &function of the fingers tendinous apparatusR01AR052345 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALERO-CUEVAS, FRANCISCO J · 2005 to 2017
$3.7M
Control of finger movement and force for precision pinchR01AR050520 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI VALERO-CUEVAS, FRANCISCO J · 2004 to 2014
$2.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050520NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR052345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models of the neuromuscular system hold the potential to allow us to reach a deeper understanding of neuromuscular function and clinical rehabilitation by complementing experimentation. By serving as a means to distill and explore specific hypotheses, computational models emerge from prior experimental data and motivate future experimental work. Here we review computational tools used to understand neuromuscular function including musculoskeletal modeling, machine learning, control theory, and statistical model analysis. We conclude that these tools, when used in combination, have the potential to further our understanding of neuromuscular function by serving as a rigorous means to test scientific hypotheses in ways that complement and leverage experimental data.

Identifiers

PMID21687779
PMCPMC3116649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.