Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21687759›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2010

A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future.

Rustam I Aminov

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06672471 (Post-Operative Antibiotic Efficacy in Clean Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 521 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
521citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06672471 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Post-Operative Antibiotic Efficacy in Clean Contaminated Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research CentreRan2024 to 2025Enrolled170ConditionsHead and Neck Neoplasms, UADT Neoplasm, Cancer of the Head and Neck, Antibiotic Resistant InfectionArmsNo Post Operative Antibiotics for intervention group, Post Operative Antibiotics for one day
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

521 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Climate change and antimicrobial resistance.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients, 2.0.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

461 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rustam I AminovRowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article gives a very brief overview of the antibiotic era, beginning from the discovery of first antibiotics until the present day situation, which is marred by the emergence of hard-to-treat multiple antibiotic-resistant infections. The ways of responding to the antibiotic resistance challenges such as the development of novel strategies in the search for new antimicrobials, designing more effective preventive measures and, importantly, better understanding the ecology of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance are discussed. The expansion of conceptual frameworks based on recent developments in the field of antimicrobials, antibiotic resistance, and chemotherapy is also discussed.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceenvironmental resistomehistory of antibiotic discoverynovel antimicrobialsprevention of antibiotic resistance

Identifiers

PMID21687759
PMCPMC3109405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.