ArticlePloS one2011
A novel network profiling analysis reveals system changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sample-Specific Generalized Cross-Validation for Gene Network Analysis of Cytarabine Response in Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Cell line-specific gene network enrichment analysis for interpreting continuous phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Statistical Inference of Phenotype-Specific Molecular Mechanisms from Cell Line-Specific Gene Regulatory Networks with Application to Quizartinib Sensitivity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Explaining hidden mechanisms: a generative model for causal graphs with nonlinear latent factors.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Generalized information criteria for personalized gene network inference.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Differential Gene Regulatory Network Analysis between Azacitidine-Sensitive and -Resistant Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A cellular regulator of the niche: telocyte.Tissue barriers · 2023Review
- Unraveling the Molecular Puzzle: Exploring Gene Networks across Diverse EMT Status of Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- New insights into KLFs and SOXs in cancer pathogenesis, stemness, and therapy.Seminars in cancer biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Computational Tactics for Precision Cancer Network Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Xprediction: Explainable EGFR-TKIs response prediction based on drug sensitivity specific gene networks.PloS one · 2022Article
- The roles and regulation of the KLF5 transcription factor in cancers.Cancer science · 2021Review
- KLF5 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition of liver cancer cells in the context of p53 loss through miR-192 targeting of ZEB2.Cell adhesion & migration · 2020Article
- System-Based Differential Gene Network Analysis for Characterizing a Sample-Specific Subnetwork.Biomolecules · 2020Article
- Global gene network exploration based on explainable artificial intelligence approach.PloS one · 2020Article
- Transcriptome analyses of reprogrammed feather / scale chimeric explants revealed co-expressed epithelial gene networks during organ specification.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Grhl2 reduces invasion and migration through inhibition of TGFβ-induced EMT in gastric cancer.Oncogenesis · 2017Article
- The Many-Faced Program of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: A System Biology-Based View.Frontiers in oncology · 2017Review
- Inflammatory breast cancer: a model for investigating cluster-based dissemination.NPJ breast cancer · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-specific analysis of molecular networks is a promising strategy for making individual risk predictions and treatment decisions in cancer therapy. Although systems biology allows the gene network of a cell to be reconstructed from clinical gene expression data, traditional methods, such as bayesian networks, only provide an averaged network for all samples. Therefore, these methods cannot reveal patient-specific differences in molecular networks during cancer progression. In this study, we developed a novel statistical method called NetworkProfiler, which infers patient-specific gene regulatory networks for a specific clinical characteristic, such as cancer progression, from gene expression data of cancer patients. We applied NetworkProfiler to microarray gene expression data from 762 cancer cell lines and extracted the system changes that were related to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Out of 1732 possible regulators of E-cadherin, a cell adhesion molecule that modulates the EMT, NetworkProfiler, identified 25 candidate regulators, of which about half have been experimentally verified in the literature. In addition, we used NetworkProfiler to predict EMT-dependent master regulators that enhanced cell adhesion, migration, invasion, and metastasis. In order to further evaluate the performance of NetworkProfiler, we selected Krueppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) from a list of the remaining candidate regulators of E-cadherin and conducted in vitro validation experiments. As a result, we found that knockdown of KLF5 by siRNA significantly decreased E-cadherin expression and induced morphological changes characteristic of EMT. In addition, in vitro experiments of a novel candidate EMT-related microRNA, miR-100, confirmed the involvement of miR-100 in several EMT-related aspects, which was consistent with the predictions obtained by NetworkProfiler.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.