ArticleBMJ case reports2009
Report on a patient with pre-existing venous thrombosis and incidental malignancy undergoing urgent laparotomy: preoperative concerns.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The management of a patient with pre-existing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) who was subsequently found to have a malignancy planned for urgent laparotomy is reported.A 30-year-old woman presented to the emergency room and was diagnosed to have a DVT. During work-up, she was found to have a malignanacy and was scheduled for urgent laparotomy. The patient was put on enoxaprin (injection) and warfarin (tablets). The patient was started on heparin (injection) 1000 IU/h at 72 h prior to operation, stopped 6 h prior to surgery. Anaesthesia and surgery were uneventful.A number of issues related to pre-existing DVTs prior to gynaecological surgery require further clarification; the optimal duration of pharmacological treatment, and the optimal duration/modality of prophylaxis to prevent thromboembolism in high-risk patients with cancer.Patients presenting for DVT must be evaluated for its causative factor(s), and malignancy in particular, based on clinical findings and investigations. Before planning surgical procedures, adequate anticoagulation must be achieved to prevent further complications of DVT, thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism in particular.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.