Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21686223›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2011

Clinical utility and development of biomarkers in invasive aspergillosis.

Thomas F Patterson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of 2-[Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in the cancer patient: recent progress and ongoing questions.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas F PattersonThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Department of Medicine-Division of Infectious Diseases, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, MSC 7881, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. patterson@uthscsa.edu
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI030041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis remains very difficult, and there are limited treatment options for the disease. Pre-clinical models have been used to evaluate the diagnosis and treatment of Aspergillus infection and to assess the pathogenicity and virulence of the organism. Extensive efforts in Aspergillus research have significantly expanded the genomic information about this microorganism. The standardization of animal models of invasive aspergillosis can be used to enhance the evaluation of genomic information about the organism to improve the diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis. One approach to this process has been the award of a contract by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health to establish and standardize animal models of invasive aspergillosis for the development of new diagnostic technologies for both pulmonary and disseminated Aspergillus infection. This work utilizes molecular approaches for the genetic manipulation of Aspergillus strains that can be tested in animal-model systems to establish new diagnostic targets and tools. Studies have evaluated the performance characteristics of assays for cell-wall antigens of Aspergillus including galactomannan and beta-D-glucan, as well as for DNA targets in the organism, through PCR. New targets, such as proteomic and genomic approaches, and novel detection methods, such as point-of-care lateral-flow devices, have also been evaluated. The goal of this paper is to provide a framework for evaluating genomic targets in animal models to improve the diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis toward ultimately improving the outcomes for patients with this frequently fatal infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillusBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalDNA, FungalGalactoseHumansInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisMannansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexVirulence FactorsAntifungal AgentsBiomarkersDNA, FungalgalactomannanGalactoseMannansVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID21686223
PMCPMC3116344
OpenAlexW14783915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.