Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21686184›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2011

Microfluidic mixing: a review.

Chia-Yen Lee, Chin-Lung Chang, Yao-Nan Wang, Lung-Ming Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
202citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

202 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Formulation of Peptide-Based Nanoparticles Using a Microfluidic Device.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Developing Micro/Nanostructured Fluidic Mixing Technology for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gradient Multinozzle 3D Printing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acoustic Rising Microbubbles for Efficient Liquid Operations.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chia-Yen LeeDepartment of Materials Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan; E-Mail: leecy@mail.npust.edu.tw.
Chin-Lung Chang
Yao-Nan Wang
Lung-Ming Fu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of microfluidic mixing is to achieve a thorough and rapid mixing of multiple samples in microscale devices. In such devices, sample mixing is essentially achieved by enhancing the diffusion effect between the different species flows. Broadly speaking, microfluidic mixing schemes can be categorized as either "active", where an external energy force is applied to perturb the sample species, or "passive", where the contact area and contact time of the species samples are increased through specially-designed microchannel configurations. Many mixers have been proposed to facilitate this task over the past 10 years. Accordingly, this paper commences by providing a high level overview of the field of microfluidic mixing devices before describing some of the more significant proposals for active and passive mixers.

Indexed as

AcousticsElectricityElectrodesHydrodynamicsMicrofluidicsUltrasonicsactive mixermicrofluidic mixingpassive micromixer

Identifiers

PMID21686184
PMCPMC3116190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.