Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21685931›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2011

From the stochasticity of molecular processes to the variability of synaptic transmission.

Claire Ribrault, Ken Sekimoto, Antoine Triller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Brain glucodynamic variability is an essential feature of the metabolism-cognition relationship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Synaptotagmin 7 Sculpts Short-Term Plasticity at a High Probability Synapse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claire RibraultLaboratoire Matières et Systèmes Complexes, CNRS-UMR7057, Université Paris 7, F-75205 Paris cedex 13, France.
Ken Sekimoto
Antoine Triller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variability of the postsynaptic response following a single action potential arises from two sources: the neurotransmitter release is probabilistic, and the postsynaptic response to neurotransmitter release has variable timing and amplitude. At individual synapses, the number of molecules of a given type that are involved in these processes is small enough that the stochastic (random) properties of molecular events cannot be neglected. How the stochasticity of molecular processes contributes to the variability of synaptic transmission, its sensitivity and its robustness to molecular fluctuations has important implications for our understanding of the mechanistic basis of synaptic transmission and of synaptic plasticity.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalStochastic ProcessesAnimalsCalcium ChannelsNeuronsNeurotransmitter AgentsPresynaptic TerminalsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionTime FactorsCalcium ChannelsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID21685931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.