Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21685355›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2011

Serological memory and long-term protection to novel H1N1 influenza virus after skin vaccination.

Dimitrios G Koutsonanos, Maria del Pilar Martin, Vladimir G Zarnitsyn, Joshy Jacob, Mark R Prausnitz, Richard W Compans, Ioanna Skountzou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Progress in microneedle array patch (MAP) for vaccine delivery.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin immunization with influenza vaccines.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dimitrios G KoutsonanosDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology and Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Maria del Pilar Martin
Vladimir G Zarnitsyn
Joshy Jacob
Mark R Prausnitz
Richard W Compans
Ioanna Skountzou
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Influenza vaccination using a microneedle patchU01EB012495 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRAUSNITZ, MARK R. · 2010 to 2015
$9.6M
Microneedle-based immunization against pandemic influenzaR01EB006369 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PRAUSNITZ, MARK R. · 2007 to 2011
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB006369NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006369NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB012495PHS HHS 5 HHSN266200700006C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major goal in influenza vaccine development is induction of serological memory and cellular responses to confer long-term protection and limit virus spread after infection. Here, we investigate induction of long-lived immunity against the 2009 H1N1 virus after skin vaccination.

methodsBALB/c mice received a single dose of 5 μg inactivated A/California/04/09 virus via coated metal microneedles (MN) applied to skin or via subcutaneous injection.

resultsMN or subcutaneous vaccination elicited similar serum IgG and hemagglutination inhibition titers and 100% protection against lethal viral challenge 6 weeks after vaccination. Six months after vaccination, the subcutaneous group exhibited a 60% decrease in functional antibody titers and extensive lung inflammation after challenge with 10 × LD(50) of homologous virus. In contrast, the MN group maintained high functional antibody titers and IFN-γ levels, inhibition of viral replication, and no signs of lung inflammation after challenge. MN vaccination conferred complete protection against lethal challenge, whereas subcutaneous vaccination induced only partial protection. These findings were further supported by high numbers of bone marrow plasma cells and spleen antibody-secreting cells detected in the MN group.

conclusionsA single skin vaccination with MN induced potent long-lived immunity and improved protection against the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus, compared with subcutaneous injection.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsAntibodies, ViralBone Marrow CellsCell LineDogsFemaleImmunity, HumoralImmunity, MucosalInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntradermalInjections, SubcutaneousMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAntibodies, ViralInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21685355
PMCPMC3144165
OpenAlexW2095925146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.