Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21685340›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2011

How reliable are tests for trachoma?--a latent class approach.

Craig W See, Wondu Alemayehu, Muluken Melese, Zhaoxia Zhou, Travis C Porco, Stephen Shiboski, Bruce D Gaynor, John Eng, Jeremy D Keenan, Thomas M Lietman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00221364 (Trachoma Elimination With Repeated Mass Azithromycin Treatments), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00221364 phase4completednot on this map

Trachoma Elimination With Repeated Mass Azithromycin Treatments

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2003 to 2005Enrolled20,000ConditionsTrachoma, ChlamydiaArmsMass treatment with oral azithromycin to an entire village
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antibiotics for trachoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Importance of including borderline cases in trachoma grader certification.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identifying Borderline Trachoma Grades Using a Three-Latent Class Model.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Trachoma risk factors in Oromia Region, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig W SeeF I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0412, USA.
Wondu Alemayehu
Muluken Melese
Zhaoxia Zhou
Travis C Porco
Stephen Shiboski
Bruce D Gaynor
John Eng
Jeremy D Keenan
Thomas M Lietman
Cancer Research And Biostatistics · USInternational Trachoma Initiative · ETOphthalmology Associates (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Berkeley Clinical Scientist Development ProgramK12EY017269 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI POLSE, KENNETH A · 2005 to 2014
$8.6M
Predicting Resistance: Validating Mathematical ModelsR21AI055752 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2003 to 2004
$379k
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY017269NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI055752PHS HHS K12EX017269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTests for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis have not been well characterized, because there is no gold standard test. Latent class analysis (LCA) was performed to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of laboratory and clinical tests for trachoma in the absence of a gold standard.

methodsIndividual data from pretreatment, hyperendemic areas in Ethiopia were used. A clustered LCA was performed for three diagnostic tests: PCR and WHO simplified criteria grades of follicular trachoma (TF) and intense trachomatous inflammation (TI).

resultsData from 2111 subjects in 40 villages were available. TF was estimated to be 87.3% (95% CI, 83.3-90.1) sensitive and 36.6% (95% CI, 23.6-40.3) specific; TI was estimated to be 53.6% (95% CI, 46.1-88.0) sensitive and 88.3% (95% CI, 83.3-92.0) specific, and PCR was estimated to be 87.5% (95% CI, 79.9-97.2) sensitive and 100% (95% CI 69.3-100) specific.

conclusionsLCA allows for an estimate of test characteristics without prior assumption of their performance. TF and TI were found to act in a complementary manner: TF is a sensitive test and TI is a specific test. PCR is highly specific but lacks sensitivity. The performance of these tests may be due to the time course of ocular chlamydial infection, and for this reason, results may differ in areas of low prevalence or recent mass treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221364).

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisDNA, BacterialEthiopiaHumansInfantPolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTrachomaDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID21685340
PMCPMC3176003
OpenAlexW2032850089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.