ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
From sets to graphs: towards a realistic enrichment analysis of transcriptomic systems.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking biological insights from differentially expressed genes: Concepts, methods, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- BugSigDB captures patterns of differential abundance across a broad range of host-associated microbial signatures.Nature biotechnology · 2024Article
- 5'-Isoforms of miR-1246 Have Distinct Targets and Stronger Functional Impact Compared with Canonical miR-1246 in Colorectal Cancer Cells In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- ActivePPI: quantifying protein-protein interaction network activity with Markov random fields.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A comprehensive survey of the approaches for pathway analysis using multi-omics data integration.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Diffusion enables integration of heterogeneous data and user-driven learning in a desktop knowledge-base.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Efficient representations of tumor diversity with paired DNA-RNA aberrations.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Gene Regulation Network Analysis on Human Prostate Orthografts Highlights a Potential Role for theCancers · 2021Article
- GeneWalk identifies relevant gene functions for a biological context using network representation learning.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Toward a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Identifying disease-associated signaling pathways through a novel effector gene analysis.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Longitudinal Stroke Recovery Associated With Dysregulation of Complement System-A Proteomics Pathway Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Identifying significantly impacted pathways: a comprehensive review and assessment.Genome biology · 2019Review
- Circ-ZNF609 regulates G1-S progression in rhabdomyosarcoma.Oncogene · 2019Article
- Article
- SPSNet: subpopulation-sensitive network-based analysis of heterogeneous gene expression data.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Altered Pathway Analyzer: A gene expression dataset analysis tool for identification and prioritization of differentially regulated and network rewired pathways.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- GFS: fuzzy preprocessing for effective gene expression analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- MinePath: Mining for Phenotype Differential Sub-paths in Molecular Pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- rapidGSEA: Speeding up gene set enrichment analysis on multi-core CPUs and CUDA-enabled GPUs.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationCurrent gene set enrichment approaches do not take interactions and associations between set members into account. Mutual activation and inhibition causing positive and negative correlation among set members are thus neglected. As a consequence, inconsistent regulations and contextless expression changes are reported and, thus, the biological interpretation of the result is impeded.
resultsWe analyzed established gene set enrichment methods and their result sets in a large-scale investigation of 1000 expression datasets. The reported statistically significant gene sets exhibit only average consistency between the observed patterns of differential expression and known regulatory interactions. We present Gene Graph Enrichment Analysis (GGEA) to detect consistently and coherently enriched gene sets, based on prior knowledge derived from directed gene regulatory networks. Firstly, GGEA improves the concordance of pairwise regulation with individual expression changes in respective pairs of regulating and regulated genes, compared with set enrichment methods. Secondly, GGEA yields result sets where a large fraction of relevant expression changes can be explained by nearby regulators, such as transcription factors, again improving on set-based methods. Thirdly, we demonstrate in additional case studies that GGEA can be applied to human regulatory pathways, where it sensitively detects very specific regulation processes, which are altered in tumors of the central nervous system. GGEA significantly increases the detection of gene sets where measured positively or negatively correlated expression patterns coincide with directed inducing or repressing relationships, thus facilitating further interpretation of gene expression data. AVAILABILITY: The method and accompanying visualization capabilities have been bundled into an R package and tied to a grahical user interface, the Galaxy workflow environment, that is running as a web server. CONTACT: Ludwig.Geistlinger@bio.ifi.lmu.de; Ralf.Zimmer@bio.ifi.lmu.de.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.