ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
Predicting site-specific human selective pressure using evolutionary signatures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphylo: A deep learning approach for predicting regulatory DNA and RNA sites from whole-genome multiple alignments.iScience · 2024Article
- Prioritizing sequence variants in conserved non-coding elements in the chicken genome using chCADD.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Natural Selection on Exonic SNPs Shapes Allelic Expression Imbalance (AEI) Adaptability in Lung Cancer Progression.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Estimation of allele-specific fitness effects across human protein-coding sequences and implications for disease.Genome research · 2019Article
- GxGrare: gene-gene interaction analysis method for rare variants from high-throughput sequencing data.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Robust sequence alignment using evolutionary rates coupled with an amino acid substitution matrix.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe identification of non-coding functional regions of the human genome remains one of the main challenges of genomics. By observing how a given region evolved over time, one can detect signs of negative or positive selection hinting that the region may be functional. With the quickly increasing number of vertebrate genomes to compare with our own, this type of approach is set to become extremely powerful, provided the right analytical tools are available.
resultsA large number of approaches have been proposed to measure signs of past selective pressure, usually in the form of reduced mutation rate. Here, we propose a radically different approach to the detection of non-coding functional region: instead of measuring past evolutionary rates, we build a machine learning classifier to predict current substitution rates in human based on the inferred evolutionary events that affected the region during vertebrate evolution. We show that different types of evolutionary events, occurring along different branches of the phylogenetic tree, bring very different amounts of information. We propose a number of simple machine learning classifiers and show that a Support-Vector Machine (SVM) predictor clearly outperforms existing tools at predicting human non-coding functional sites. Comparison to external evidences of selection and regulatory function confirms that these SVM predictions are more accurate than those of other approaches. AVAILABILITY: The predictor and predictions made are available at http://www.mcb.mcgill.ca/~blanchem/sadri. CONTACT: blanchem@mcb.mcgill.ca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.