ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011
MeSH: a window into full text for document summarization.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online Databases in Circular RNAs.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025Review
- A message passing framework with multiple data integration for miRNA-disease association prediction.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Web tools to perform long non-coding RNAs analysis in oncology research.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021Review
- COS: A new MeSH term embedding incorporating corpus, ontology, and semantic predications.PloS one · 2021Article
- CERC: an interactive content extraction, recognition, and construction tool for clinical and biomedical text.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- ENdb: a manually curated database of experimentally supported enhancers for human and mouse.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Nc2Eye: A Curated ncRNAomics Knowledgebase for Bridging Basic and Clinical Research in Eye Diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
- LncRNADisease 2.0: an updated database of long non-coding RNA-associated diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- MNDR v2.0: an updated resource of ncRNA-disease associations in mammals.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Social media engagement analysis of U.S. Federal health agencies on Facebook.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- MeSH Now: automatic MeSH indexing at PubMed scale via learning to rank.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2017Article
- Article
- Figure-associated text summarization and evaluation.PloS one · 2015Article
- Literature-based discovery of salivary biomarkers for type 2 diabetes mellitus.Biomarker insights · 2015Article
- Article
- PubMedMiner: Mining and Visualizing MeSH-based Associations in PubMed.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2014Article
- Engagement with health agencies on twitter.PloS one · 2014Article
- Automatically extracting clinically useful sentences from UpToDate to support clinicians' information needs.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationPrevious research in the biomedical text-mining domain has historically been limited to titles, abstracts and metadata available in MEDLINE records. Recent research initiatives such as TREC Genomics and BioCreAtIvE strongly point to the merits of moving beyond abstracts and into the realm of full texts. Full texts are, however, more expensive to process not only in terms of resources needed but also in terms of accuracy. Since full texts contain embellishments that elaborate, contextualize, contrast, supplement, etc., there is greater risk for false positives. Motivated by this, we explore an approach that offers a compromise between the extremes of abstracts and full texts. Specifically, we create reduced versions of full text documents that contain only important portions. In the long-term, our goal is to explore the use of such summaries for functions such as document retrieval and information extraction. Here, we focus on designing summarization strategies. In particular, we explore the use of MeSH terms, manually assigned to documents by trained annotators, as clues to select important text segments from the full text documents.
resultsOur experiments confirm the ability of our approach to pick the important text portions. Using the ROUGE measures for evaluation, we were able to achieve maximum ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2 and ROUGE-SU4 F-scores of 0.4150, 0.1435 and 0.1782, respectively, for our MeSH term-based method versus the maximum baseline scores of 0.3815, 0.1353 and 0.1428, respectively. Using a MeSH profile-based strategy, we were able to achieve maximum ROUGE F-scores of 0.4320, 0.1497 and 0.1887, respectively. Human evaluation of the baselines and our proposed strategies further corroborates the ability of our method to select important sentences from the full texts. CONTACT: sanmitra-bhattacharya@uiowa.edu; padmini-srinivasan@uiowa.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.