Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21685046›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2011

Noise reduction in genome-wide perturbation screens using linear mixed-effect models.

Danni Yu, John Danku, Ivan Baxter, Sungjin Kim, Olena K Vatamaniuk, David E Salt, Olga Vitek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danni YuDepartment of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
John Danku
Ivan Baxter
Sungjin Kim
Olena K Vatamaniuk
David E Salt
Olga Vitek

Funding

TOOLS FOR DIFFERENTIAL METABOLOMICS(RMI)R33DK070290 · NIDDK · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI REGNIER, FRED E · 2005 to 2006
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS 4R33DK070290-02NIDDK NIH HHS R33 DK070290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationHigh-throughput perturbation screens measure the phenotypes of thousands of biological samples under various conditions. The phenotypes measured in the screens are subject to substantial biological and technical variation. At the same time, in order to enable high throughput, it is often impossible to include a large number of replicates, and to randomize their order throughout the screens. Distinguishing true changes in the phenotype from stochastic variation in such experimental designs is extremely challenging, and requires adequate statistical methodology.

resultsWe propose a statistical modeling framework that is based on experimental designs with at least two controls profiled throughout the experiment, and a normalization and variance estimation procedure with linear mixed-effects models. We evaluate the framework using three comprehensive screens of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which involve 4940 single-gene knock-out haploid mutants, 1127 single-gene knock-out diploid mutants and 5798 single-gene overexpression haploid strains. We show that the proposed approach (i) can be used in conjunction with practical experimental designs; (ii) allows extensions to alternative experimental workflows; (iii) enables a sensitive discovery of biologically meaningful changes; and (iv) strongly outperforms the existing noise reduction procedures. AVAILABILITY: All experimental datasets are publicly available at www.ionomicshub.org. The R package HTSmix is available at http://www.stat.purdue.edu/~ovitek/HTSmix.html. CONTACT: ovitek@stat.purdue.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysPhenotypeGene Knockout TechniquesGenomicsLinear ModelsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID21685046
PMCPMC3150043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.