Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21684262›Full record

ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2011

Functional brain imaging of nicotinic effects on higher cognitive processes.

Paul A Newhouse, Alexandra S Potter, Julie A Dumas, Christiane M Thiel

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Attention-enhancing effects of propranolol and synergistic effects with nicotine.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Non-pharmacological factors that determine drug use and addiction.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul A NewhouseClinical Neuroscience Research Unit and Brain Imaging Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05401, USA. Paul.Newhouse@uvm.edu
Alexandra S Potter
Julie A Dumas
Christiane M Thiel
University of Vermont · USCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

Estrogen Effects on Cholinergic Function in Older WomenR01AG021476 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NEWHOUSE, PAUL A. · 2003 to 2013
$4.2M
Transdermal Nicotine Treatment of MCIR01AG022462 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT &ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI NEWHOUSE, PAUL A. · 2003 to 2007
$2.0M
Neurobiological Underpinnings of Cognitive Deficits in Neurodevelopmental DisordeK23MH079216 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI POTTER, ALEXANDRA S · 2009 to 2013
$764k
Hormone and Neurotransmitter Interactions in Cognitive AgingK01AG030380 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI DUMAS, JULIE A · 2008 to 2012
$650k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG030380NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021476NIA NIH HHS R01 AG022462NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH079216PHS HHS R01 021476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant advances in human functional brain imaging offer new opportunities for direct observation of the effects of nicotine, novel nicotinic agonists and nicotinic antagonists on human cognitive and behavioral performance. Careful research over the last decade has enabled investigators to explore the role of nicotinic systems on the functional neuroanatomy and neural circuitry of cognitive tasks in domains such as selective attention, working memory, episodic memory, cognitive control, and emotional processing. In addition, recent progress in understanding functional connectivity between brain regions utilized during cognitive and emotional processes offers new opportunities for examining drug effects on network-related activity. This review will critically summarize available nicotinic functional brain imaging studies focusing on the specific cognitive domains of attention, memory, behavioral control, and emotional processing. Generally speaking, nicotine appears to increase task-related activity in non-smokers and deprived smokers, but not active smokers. By contrast, nicotine or nicotinic stimulation decreases the activity of structures associated with the default mode network. These particular patterns of activation and/or deactivation may be useful for early drug development and may be an efficient and cost-effective method of screening potential nicotinic agents. Further studies will have to be done to clarify whether such activity changes correlate with cognitive or affective outcomes that are clinically relevant. The use of functional brain imaging will be a key tool for probing pathologic changes related to brain illness and for nicotinic drug development.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsAttentionBrain MappingCognitionHumansMemoryNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsTask Performance and AnalysisNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID21684262
PMCPMC3162085
OpenAlexW2019160658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.