Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2011
Development and validation of a novel molecular biomarker diagnostic test for the early detection of sepsis.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
101 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 242 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Utility of Host RNA Biosignatures in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- Upregulation of CRISP3 and its clinical values in adult sepsis: a comprehensive analysis based on microarrays and a two-retrospective-cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Screening of core genes prognostic for sepsis and construction of a ceRNA regulatory network.BMC medical genomics · 2023Pooled it
- Emerging strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2019Pooled it
- The immunosuppressive face of sepsis early on intensive care unit-A large-scale microarray meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Lysosome and Cytoskeleton Pathways Are Robustly Enriched in the Blood of Septic Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Transcriptomic Data.Mediators of inflammation · 2015Pooled it
- Dynamic expression of leukocyte innate immune genes in whole blood from horses with lipopolysaccharide-induced acute systemic inflammation.BMC veterinary research · 2015Trial
- lncRNA-mRNA Co-expression Network Unveils Neutrophil Metabolic Reprogramming in Human Sepsis.Inflammation · 2026Article
- Article
- Lysosome-related biomarkers in peripheral blood immune cells discriminate sepsis from SIRS.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis of transcriptome and single-cell sequencing combined with experimental validation identifies biomarkers associated with T cell and senescence in sepsis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics analysis reveals the association of bile acid metabolism-related genes with sepsis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics analysis of pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes in sepsis and diabetes mellitus.PloS one · 2026Article
- Early biomarkers for predicting sepsis-induced shock: insights from inflammatory pathways and immune response.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Article
- Mechanism of sepsis regulation by ELANE via macrophage polarization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CTSO and HLA-DQA1 as biomarkers in sepsis-associated ARDS: insights from RNA sequencing and immune infiltration analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- S100P is a core gene for diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of sepsis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- FUNCTIONAL IMMUNOPHENOTYPING FOR PRECISION THERAPIES IN SEPSIS.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2025Review
- Identification of prognostic biomarkers of sepsis and construction of ceRNA regulatory networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis is a complex immunological response to infection characterized by early hyper-inflammation followed by severe and protracted immunosuppression, suggesting that a multi-marker approach has the greatest clinical utility for early detection, within a clinical environment focused on Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) differentiation. Pre-clinical research using an equine sepsis model identified a panel of gene expression biomarkers that define the early aberrant immune activation. Thus, the primary objective was to apply these gene expression biomarkers to distinguish patients with sepsis from those who had undergone major open surgery and had clinical outcomes consistent with systemic inflammation due to physical trauma and wound healing.
methodsThis was a multi-centre, prospective clinical trial conducted across four tertiary critical care settings in Australia. Sepsis patients were recruited if they met the 1992 Consensus Statement criteria and had clinical evidence of systemic infection based on microbiology diagnoses (n = 27). Participants in the post-surgical (PS) group were recruited pre-operatively and blood samples collected within 24 hours following surgery (n = 38). Healthy controls (HC) included hospital staff with no known concurrent illnesses (n = 20). Each participant had minimally 5 ml of PAXgene blood collected for leucocyte RNA isolation and gene expression analyses. Affymetrix array and multiplex tandem (MT)-PCR studies were conducted to evaluate transcriptional profiles in circulating white blood cells applying a set of 42 molecular markers that had been identified a priori. A LogitBoost algorithm was used to create a machine learning diagnostic rule to predict sepsis outcomes.
resultsBased on preliminary microarray analyses comparing HC and sepsis groups, a panel of 42-gene expression markers were identified that represented key innate and adaptive immune function, cell cycling, WBC differentiation, extracellular remodelling and immune modulation pathways. Comparisons against GEO data confirmed the definitive separation of the sepsis cohort. Quantitative PCR results suggest the capacity for this test to differentiate severe systemic inflammation from HC is 92%. The area under the curve (AUC) receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve findings demonstrated sepsis prediction within a mixed inflammatory population, was between 86 and 92%.
conclusionsThis novel molecular biomarker test has a clinically relevant sensitivity and specificity profile, and has the capacity for early detection of sepsis via the monitoring of critical care patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.