Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21682877›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2011

Mature autologous dendritic cell vaccines in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I pilot study.

Maurício W Perroud, Helen N Honma, Aristóteles S Barbeiro, Simone Co Gilli, Maria T Almeida, José Vassallo, Sara To Saad, Lair Zambon

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Adoptive cell therapies in thoracic malignancies.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Immune cell engineering: opportunities in lung cancer therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Human IP10-scFv and DC-induced CTL synergistically inhibit the growth of glioma in a xenograft model.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer targeting vaccines: surrogate measures of activity.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maurício W PerroudDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Helen N Honma
Aristóteles S Barbeiro
Simone Co Gilli
Maria T Almeida
José Vassallo
Sara To Saad
Lair Zambon
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverall therapeutic outcomes of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poor. The dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy has been developed as a new strategy for the treatment of lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and immunologic responses in use in mature, antigen-pulsed autologous DC vaccine in NSCLC patients.

methodsFive HLA-A2 patients with inoperable stage III or IV NSCLC were selected to receive two doses of 5 × 107 DC cells administered subcutaneous and intravenously two times at two week intervals. The immunologic response, safety and tolerability to the vaccine were evaluated by the lymphoproliferation assay and clinical and laboratorial evolution, respectively.

resultsThe dose of the vaccine has shown to be safe and well tolerated. The lymphoproliferation assay showed an improvement in the specific immune response after the immunization, with a significant response after the second dose (p = 0.005). This response was not long lasting and a tendency to reduction two weeks after the second dose of the vaccine was observed. Two patients had a survival almost twice greater than the expected average and were the only ones that expressed HER-2 and CEA together.

conclusionDespite the small sample size, the results on the immune response, safety and tolerability, combined with the results of other studies, are encouraging to the conduction of a large clinical trial with multiples doses in patients with early lung cancer who underwent surgical treatment.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials: ISRCTN45563569.

Indexed as

AgedCancer VaccinesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID21682877
PMCPMC3135553
OpenAlexW2142735836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.