Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21682603›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2011

Altered obstacle negotiation after low thoracic hemisection in the cat.

Adele E Doperalski, Nicole J Tester, Stephanie C Jefferson, Dena R Howland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neuromechanical Strategies for Obstacle Negotiation during Overground Locomotion following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Cats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Plastic Changes in Lumbar Locomotor Networks after a Partial Spinal Cord Injury in Cats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adele E DoperalskiBrain Rehabilitation and Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Nicole J Tester
Stephanie C Jefferson
Dena R Howland
University of Florida · US

Funding

Training In Rehabilitation and Neuromuscular PlasticityT32HD043730 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI DAVID D FULLER · 2003 to 2026
$5.3M
Spinal cord injury: CS proteoglycans and motor recoveryR01NS050699 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HOWLAND, DENA R. · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Training Effects on Recovery of Balance and Limb Accuracy in Cats Post-SCII01RX000243 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI BEHRMAN, ANDREA L., HOWLAND, DENA R. · 2012 to 2014
–
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD043730NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following a lateralized spinal cord injury (SCI) in humans, substantial walking recovery occurs; however, deficits persist in adaptive features of locomotion critical for community ambulation, including obstacle negotiation. Normal obstacle negotiation is accomplished by an increase in flexion during swing. If an object is unanticipated or supraspinal input is absent, obstacle negotiation may involve the spinally organized stumbling corrective response. How these voluntary and reflex components are affected following partial SCI is not well studied. This study is the first to characterize recovery of obstacle negotiation following low-thoracic spinal hemisection in the cat. Cats were trained pre- and post-injury to cross a runway with an obstacle. Assessments focused on the hindlimb ipsilateral to the lesion. Pre-injury, cats efficiently cleared an obstacle by increasing knee flexion during swing. Post-injury, obstacle clearance permanently changed. At 2 weeks, when basic overground walking ability been recovered, the hindlimb was dragged over the obstacle (∼90%). Surprisingly, the stumbling corrective response was not elicited until after 2 weeks. Despite a notable increase, between 4 and 8 weeks, in the ability to modify limb trajectory when approaching an obstacle, limb lift during obstacle approach was insufficient during ∼50% of encounters and continued to evoke the stumbling corrective response even at 16 weeks. A post-injury lead limb bias identified during negotiations with complete clearance, suggests a potential training strategy to increase the number of successful clearances. Therefore, following complete severing of half of the spinal cord, the ability to modify ipsilateral hindlimb trajectory shows significant recovery and by 16 weeks permits effective clearing of an obstacle, without contact, ∼50% of the time. Although this suggests plasticity of supporting circuitry, it is insufficient to support consistent clearance. This inconsistency, even at the most chronic time point assessed (16 weeks), is probably a contributing factor to falls reported for people with SCI.

Indexed as

AnimalsCatsLocomotionMotor ActivityRecovery of FunctionSpinal CordSpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID21682603
PMCPMC3172876
OpenAlexW2053218698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.