Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21681149›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2011

Epitope prediction based on random peptide library screening: benchmark dataset and prediction tools evaluation.

Pingping Sun, Wenhan Chen, Yanxin Huang, Hongyan Wang, Zhiqiang Ma, Yinghua Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bioinformatics resources and tools for conformational B-cell epitope prediction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013
    Review
  7. MimoDB 2.0: a mimotope database and beyond.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pingping SunFaculty of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Wenhan Chen
Yanxin Huang
Hongyan Wang
Zhiqiang Ma
Yinghua Lv

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epitope prediction based on random peptide library screening has become a focus as a promising method in immunoinformatics research. Some novel software and web-based servers have been proposed in recent years and have succeeded in given test cases. However, since the number of available mimotopes with the relevant structure of template-target complex is limited, a systematic evaluation of these methods is still absent. In this study, a new benchmark dataset was defined. Using this benchmark dataset and a representative dataset, five examples of the most popular epitope prediction software products which are based on random peptide library screening have been evaluated. Using the benchmark dataset, in no method did performance exceed a 0.42 precision and 0.37 sensitivity, and the MCC scores suggest that the epitope prediction results of these software programs are greater than random prediction about 0.09-0.13; while using the representative dataset, most of the values of these performance measures are slightly improved, but the overall performance is still not satisfactory. Many test cases in the benchmark dataset cannot be applied to these pieces of software due to software limitations. Moreover chances are that these software products are overfitted to the small dataset and will fail in other cases. Therefore finding the correlation between mimotopes and genuine epitope residues is still far from resolved and much larger dataset for mimotope-based epitope prediction is desirable.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingPeptide LibrarySoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualEpitopes, B-LymphocyteSensitivity and SpecificityEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptide Library

Identifiers

PMID21681149
PMCPMC6264216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.