ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2011
Epitope prediction based on random peptide library screening: benchmark dataset and prediction tools evaluation.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting inhibitor development using a random peptide phage-display library approach in the SIPPET cohort.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023Review
- Prediction of antibody structural epitopes via random peptide library screening and next generation sequencing.Journal of immunological methods · 2017Article
- The Relationship between B-cell Epitope and Mimotope Sequences.Protein and peptide letters · 2016Article
- Conformational B-cell epitope prediction method based on antigen preprocessing and mimotopes analysis.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Bioinformatics resources and tools for conformational B-cell epitope prediction.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Review
- MimoDB 2.0: a mimotope database and beyond.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Virtual interactomics of proteins from biochemical standpoint.Molecular biology international · 2012Article
- PepMapper: a collaborative web tool for mapping epitopes from affinity-selected peptides.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epitope prediction based on random peptide library screening has become a focus as a promising method in immunoinformatics research. Some novel software and web-based servers have been proposed in recent years and have succeeded in given test cases. However, since the number of available mimotopes with the relevant structure of template-target complex is limited, a systematic evaluation of these methods is still absent. In this study, a new benchmark dataset was defined. Using this benchmark dataset and a representative dataset, five examples of the most popular epitope prediction software products which are based on random peptide library screening have been evaluated. Using the benchmark dataset, in no method did performance exceed a 0.42 precision and 0.37 sensitivity, and the MCC scores suggest that the epitope prediction results of these software programs are greater than random prediction about 0.09-0.13; while using the representative dataset, most of the values of these performance measures are slightly improved, but the overall performance is still not satisfactory. Many test cases in the benchmark dataset cannot be applied to these pieces of software due to software limitations. Moreover chances are that these software products are overfitted to the small dataset and will fail in other cases. Therefore finding the correlation between mimotopes and genuine epitope residues is still far from resolved and much larger dataset for mimotope-based epitope prediction is desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.