Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21680752›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2011

Rationally designed treatment for solid tumors with MAPK pathway activation: a phase I study of paclitaxel and bortezomib using an adaptive dose-finding approach.

Janice M Mehnert, Antoinette R Tan, Rebecca Moss, Elizabeth Poplin, Mark N Stein, Mika Sovak, Kelly Levinson, Hongxia Lin, Michael Kane, Murugesan Gounder and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adaptive dose-finding studies: a review of model-guided phase I clinical trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janice M MehnertDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Antoinette R Tan
Rebecca Moss
Elizabeth Poplin
Mark N Stein
Mika Sovak
Kelly Levinson
Hongxia Lin
Michael Kane
Murugesan Gounder
Yong Lin
Weichung Joe Shih
Eileen White
Eric H Rubin
Vassiliki Karantza
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Function of the Adenovirus E1B OncogeneR37CA053370 · NCI · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI WHITE, EILEEN P. · 2001 to 2009
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS L30 CA116898NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R37 CA053370NCI NIH HHS R37CA53370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the preclinical setting, phosphorylation and subsequent proteosomal degradation of the proapoptotic protein BIM confers resistance to paclitaxel in solid tumors with RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway activation. Concurrent administration of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib enables paclitaxel-induced BIM accumulation, restoring cancer cell apoptosis in vitro and producing tumor regression in mice in vivo. A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel and bortezomib combinatorial treatment. Sixteen patients with refractory solid tumors commonly exhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway activation were treated weekly with paclitaxel and bortezomib. Starting doses were 40 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel and 0.7 mg/m(2) for bortezomib. A modified continual reassessment method adapted for 2-drug escalation was used for MTD determination with 3-patient cohorts treated at each dose level. MTD was reached at 60 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and 1.0 mg/m(2) bortezomib, the recommended phase II dose. Therapy was overall well tolerated. Most frequently observed toxicities included anemia (in 43.75% of patients, one grade 3 event), fatigue (in 43.75% of patients, one grade 3 event beyond cycle 1), and neuropathy (in 31.25% of patients, one grade 3 event after cycle 1). Of 15 evaluable patients, one non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patient with paclitaxel exposure at the adjuvant setting had a partial response and five patients had stable disease (SD); median disease stabilization was 143.5 days; three NSCLC patients had SD lasting 165 days or longer. Thus, rationally designed weekly treatment with paclitaxel and bortezomib in solid tumors with MAPK pathway activation, including previously taxane-treated malignancies, is a tolerable regimen with preliminary signals of antitumor activity worthy of further investigation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBoronic AcidsBortezomibFemaleHumansMaleMAP Kinase Signaling SystemMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesNeoplasmsPaclitaxelPyrazinesTreatment OutcomeBoronic AcidsBortezomibMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPaclitaxelPyrazines

Identifiers

PMID21680752
PMCPMC3155243
OpenAlexW2128209127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.