Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21680278›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives2011

Developing a bidirectional academic-community partnership with an Appalachian-American community for environmental health research and risk communication.

Erin N Haynes, Caroline Beidler, Richard Wittberg, Lisa Meloncon, Megan Parin, Elizabeth J Kopras, Paul Succop, Kim N Dietrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Scoping Review of Capacity-Building Efforts to Address Environmental Justice Concerns.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Public Participation in Air Sampling and Water Quality Test Kit Development to Enable Citizen Science.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin N HaynesDepartment of Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Haynes@uc.edu
Caroline Beidler
Richard Wittberg
Lisa Meloncon
Megan Parin
Elizabeth J Kopras
Paul Succop
Kim N Dietrich

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI YADAV, JAGJIT S · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Molecular Epidemiology in Children's Environmental Health Training Program (MECEH)T32ES010957 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Kelly J Brunst · 2001 to 2026
$11.1M
Marietta Community Actively Researching Exposure StudyR01ES016531 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HAYNES, ERIN N · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
Neurobehavioral Effect of Low Level Mangenese ExposureR21ES013524 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HAYNES, ERIN N · 2005 to 2006
$336k
NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD059615-01NIEHS NIH HHS 1R21ES013524-02NIEHS NIH HHS 5T32ES10957NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30-ES06096NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016531NIEHS NIH HHS R01ES016531NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES013524NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES010957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarietta, Ohio, is an Appalachian-American community whose residents have long struggled with understanding their exposure to airborne manganese (Mn). Although community engagement in research is strongly endorsed by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in particular, little has been documented demonstrating how an academic-community partnership that implements the community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles can be created and mobilized for research.

objectivesWe created a bidirectional, academic-community partnership with an Appalachian-American community to a) identify the community's thoughts and perceptions about local air quality, its effect on health, and the perception of risk communication sources and b) jointly develop and conduct environmental health research.

methodsWe formed a community advisory board (CAB), jointly conducted pilot research studies, and used the results to develop a community-driven research agenda.

resultsPersons in the community were "very concerned" to "concerned" about local air quality (91%) and perceived the air quality to have a direct impact on their health and on their children's health (93% and 94%, respectively). The CAB identified the primary research question: "Does Mn affect the cognition and behavior of children?" Although the community members perceived research scientists as the most trusted and knowledgeable regarding risks from industrial emissions, they received very little risk information from research scientists.

conclusionsEngaging a community in environmental health research from its onset enhanced the quality and relevance of the research investigation. The CBPR principles were a useful framework in building a strong academic-community partnership. Because of the current disconnect between communities and research scientists, academic researchers should consider working collaboratively with community-based risk communication sources.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Health PlanningEnvironmental HealthHumansManganeseOhioUnited StatesManganese

Identifiers

PMID21680278
PMCPMC3230433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.