Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21678340›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011

Epinephrine for bronchiolitis.

Lisa Hartling, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, David W Johnson, Amy C Plint, Terry P Klassen, Hema Patel, Ricardo M Fernandes

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01834820 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study: Epinephrine, Dexamethasone, and Hypertonic Saline in Children With Bronchiolitis, Randomised Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Naval de Alta Especialidad - Escuela Medico NavalRan2013 to 2015Enrolled120ConditionsBronchiolitisArmsEpinephrine and Dexamethasone, Hypertonic Saline, Normal Saline
NCT02793674 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Flow Titration and Effort of Breathing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital Los AngelesRan2014 to 2016Enrolled21ConditionsHigh Flow Nasal CannulaArmsFisher & Paykel high flow nasal cannula, Vapotherm high flow nasal cannula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 277 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Surfactant therapy for bronchiolitis in critically ill infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  13. Leukotriene inhibitors for bronchiolitis in infants and young children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  14. Bronchodilators for bronchiolitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  15. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  16. Glucocorticoids for acute viral bronchiolitis in infants and young children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa HartlingDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Aberhart Centre One, Room 9424, 11402 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2J3.
Liza M Bialy
Ben Vandermeer
Lisa Tjosvold
David W Johnson
Amy C Plint
Terry P Klassen
Hema Patel
Ricardo M Fernandes
University of Alberta · CAChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchodilators are commonly used for acute bronchiolitis, despite uncertain effectiveness.

objectivesTo examine the efficacy and safety of epinephrine in children less than two with acute viral bronchiolitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL (2010, Issue 3) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialized Register, MEDLINE (1950 to September Week 2, 2010), EMBASE (1980 to September 2010), Scopus (1823 to September 2010), PubMed (March 2010), LILACS (1985 to September 2010) and Iran MedEx (1998 to September 2010). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials comparing epinephrine to placebo or another intervention involving children less than two years with acute viral bronchiolitis. Studies were included if the trials presented data for at least one quantitative outcome of interest.We selected primary outcomes a priori, based on clinical relevance: rate of admission by days one and seven of presentation for outpatients, and length of stay (LOS) for inpatients. Secondary outcomes included clinical severity scores, pulmonary function, symptoms, quality of life and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened the searches, applied inclusion criteria, assessed risk of bias and graded the evidence. We conducted separate analyses for different comparison groups (placebo, non-epinephrine bronchodilators, glucocorticoids) and for clinical setting (inpatient, outpatient). MAIN

resultsWe included 19 studies (2256 participants). Epinephrine versus placebo among outpatients showed a significant reduction in admissions at Day 1 (risk ratio (RR) 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.89) but not at Day 7 post-emergency department visit. There was no difference in LOS for inpatients. Epinephrine versus salbutamol showed no differences among outpatients for admissions at Day 1 or 7. Inpatients receiving epinephrine had a significantly shorter LOS compared to salbutamol (mean difference -0.28; 95% CI -0.46 to -0.09). One large RCT showed a significantly shorter admission rate at Day 7 for epinephrine and steroid combined versus placebo (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44 to 0.95). There were no important differences in adverse events. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis review demonstrates the superiority of epinephrine compared to placebo for short-term outcomes for outpatients, particularly in the first 24 hours of care. Exploratory evidence from a single study suggests benefits of epinephrine and steroid combined for later time points. More research is required to confirm the benefits of combined epinephrine and steroids among outpatients. There is no evidence of effectiveness for repeated dose or prolonged use of epinephrine or epinephrine and dexamethasone combined among inpatients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAlbuterolBronchiolitisBronchodilator AgentsEpinephrineHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID21678340
PMCPMC12861581
OpenAlexW2131794884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.