ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2012
Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Shared decision-making behaviours in health professionals: a systematic review of studies based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- Trial
- What Time is it? Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Ethiopia.AIDS and behavior · 2016Trial
- Multidisciplinary Intervention in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2016Trial
- The transition from medical to vocational rehabilitation in Germany: an exploratory mixed methods study on rehabilitants' experiences.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Supporting Oral and Long-Acting HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women (MyChoice Intervention): Protocol for 2 Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Improving shared decision-making in bronchiectasis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Review
- Association of shared decision-making cessation model and adult smoking cessation rate: A prospective cohort study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Nurse-related behavioural determinants associated with healthy eating support provided by Dutch community nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- An Egalitarian Perspective on Information Sharing: The Example of Health Care Priorities.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2024Article
- Factors influencing shared decision-making for insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea treatment among Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024Article
- Patients' experiences with shared decision-making in home-based palliative care - navigation through major life decisions.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Sharing a medical decision.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024Article
- AI and the need for justification (to the patient).Ethics and information technology · 2024Article
- Lipid-lowering agent preferences among patients with hypercholesterolemia: a focus group study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) Options Using a Questionnaire for Respiratory Allergic Patients: A Delphi Consensus Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Technologically assisted intensive home treatment: feasibility study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Digital health technologies to support medication adherence in chronic kidney disease.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years the formerly quite strong interest in patient compliance has been questioned for being too paternalistic and oriented towards overly narrow biomedical goals as the basis for treatment recommendations. In line with this there has been a shift towards using the notion of adherence to signal an increased weight for patients' preferences and autonomy in decision making around treatments. This 'adherence-paradigm' thus encompasses shared decision-making as an ideal and patient perspective and autonomy as guiding goals of care. What this implies in terms of the importance that we have reason to attach to (non-)adherence and how has, however, not been explained. In this article, we explore the relationship between different forms of shared decision-making, patient autonomy and adherence. Distinguishing between dynamically and statically framed adherence we show how the version of shared decision-making advocated will have consequences for whether one should be interested in a dynamically or statically framed adherence and in what way patient adherence should be assessed. In contrast to the former compliance paradigm (where non-compliance was necessarily seen as a problem), using observations about (non-)adherence to assess the success of health care decision making and professional-patient interaction turns out to be a much less straightforward matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21678125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.